Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (95335)	1/31/2005 1:58:48 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

You know, I don't think you read what you post to me. Let's try again - see, Nixon's attacks on Cambodia were an effort to cut off supplies to the VC, and did not supply or support Pol Pot in any way. Action against the VC and NVA that may have contributed to instability in Cambodia is NOT the same same as being "complicit" in Pol Pot's rise to power. But like I said, you just go on believing whatever funky thing you want.