Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: yardslave who wrote (2704)	2/1/2005 3:14:34 PM
From: ravenseye	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

lma(zz)o at you! You asked for names in the A@P grand conspiracy. What makes you think I have them to give? You might want to take time to read the boards since your 3 1/2 year sabbatical from posting. Specifically 01/25/05 the date tony was found guilty of 11 counts against him, including five counts of securities fraud, a count of racketeering conspiracy, a count of securities fraud conspiracy, a count of extortion, a count of extortion conspiracy, and two counts of wire fraud. Is that conspiracy enough for you, or are you to dull to understand what the jury decided? I had brought up the people mentioned because since my arrival here on SI I have found discrepancies in stories told and why I took time to read threads and regulatory findings. Two seem to have a common problem, being served with complaints and the third has been sanctioned. The webnode story is what really perked my interest because janice claimed the Business Wire alleged charges were not as they were. Business Wire being paid by jeffs homeowners policy was a real hoot to read, and why the character make up of prolific posters who seem to have a habit of posting insults etc. became of interest to me. Do you have a problem with that? Am I suppose to have your permission to read up on and point out in my opinion discrepancies? It seems old habits die hard. Maybe you should do as you suggest I do, that is reread posts, then maybe you will understand that timelines and events don't agree in my opinion with what janice claimed. I don't need hints from you, but I do believe you are attempting to intimidate me for what ever reason only you know. People who use acts of intimidation think they matter, but where I come from they are considered ruffian. Is that the true meaning of your post? Am I suppose to care who you are yardslave? Give me one reason why I should! For some reason you feel the need to tell me what I need to do! I live in a free country, where I can decide what I need to do for myself, and not take orders from the likes of you or anyone else. Are there dirty secrets that are hidden in the archives that are really threatening you? Your story doesn't make sense, you claim that you simply don't have the time to mess with it (message boards) but that is exactly what your doing, messing with me. Why should I care about RB any way? Believe me, there is enough information in SI closets to keep my reading time enjoyable and my interests perked upon stumbling across discrepancies of stories told. Are you advocating I should be reading anything specific over on RB? Give me a link and I will check out what ever it is you suggest.