Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The new NFL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (9762)	2/2/2005 11:25:59 AM
From: Oral Roberts	Respond to of 91333

I think our defense is so bad I would worry about that first and foremost. The little of Nall I've seen I was impressed. Work on D and our offensive game plan before worrying about a QB I'm thinking. I understand for the next couple of years that Sherman has put us in cap troubles also so perhaps there is no hope anyhow. Another good reason for Brett to retire.

To: Bill who wrote (9762)	2/2/2005 11:27:35 AM
From: SE	Respond to of 91333

Favre is not going to retire. He will play another three, maybe four years. IMHO. If he does retire, then Thompson should gut the roster and start over. Heck, maybe he should anyway. In today's NFL many teams go from bottom dwelers to playoffs in a single year. No reason we cannot either. Heck, I think we can resurrect our Defense by next season. I like the simplicity of the new guy's D. All this gimic D stuff is for the birds. I believe that if you have a gimic D, you are saying to the world, our guys cannot match up so we have to rely on gimics. Fock that. Line 'em up and play 'em. We only need a couple more guys on D and back to the basics. Simplicity. I also think that would help the offence. How many times does Brett see one thing and the receiver something else. Sheesh. Simplify and then have your players go out and beat their players. Man, arm chair coaching is so easy.