SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pluvia who wrote (2749)2/3/2005 12:27:45 PM
From: hedgefundman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5425
 
hold on now pardner. din't you say that Elgindy was the biggest liar? yo' words pardner.

you be saying "the liar of my liar is the lawyer?"

maybe you be the expert on liars

sheeple flock and say "t'aint me."

"jest bidness"

wah wah wah lookeee all the other bad stock deals and no gummint goin' after them. wah wah wah

yeah, but yo forget 'bout the 'x tort ion ring and da fbi "in da house" with cards on foreheads and posteriors, all a laughin' and a celebratin'

or the trails from trials and trials from trails.

mebbe yo' shou'nt 'tract so much 'tension to the sheeple.

neither daws nor elgindy were employees of cardinal. typical lawyer lies... they say anything to win an argument.



To: Pluvia who wrote (2749)2/4/2005 10:33:40 AM
From: ravenseye  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5425
 
The lawyers you claim lied didn't say daws or elgindy were employees of Cardinal. Seems that's an argument you're trying to make. I behest you to reread
On April 11, 2000 Cardinal employee Kent McGaughy called into Terayon’s quarterly earnings conference call. McGaughy used a false name, and posing as a bona fide securities analyst, accused Terayon of fraud. Defendants assert that two other people participated in the conference call at Cardinal’s behest. These two, Jonathan Daws and Amir Elgindy also used false names and raised issues of alleged fraud by Terayon.
cand.uscourts.gov



To: Pluvia who wrote (2749)2/16/2005 11:19:15 AM
From: Dan B.  Respond to of 5425
 
There is obviously, despite your wonderment, a distinction to be made between "at the behest of" and "employee." However, I can assume you are telling the truth when you appear to know just who was not employed by Cardinal, you probably have high certainty born of personal relationships, and/or more.

I recall here that Anthony jumped aboard the TERN bash for awhile, then turned strongly against you on the matter. It would fit.

Dan B.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News