SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (217159)2/4/2005 1:06:47 AM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572207
 
>Including those 80-year-olds who spent their entire life's savings on wild living, instead of responsibly saving it up for retirement?

I know what your answer is going to be

You got it:

"You talk about Social Security like it's some huge amount of money... it's basically just enough to keep its recipients out of poverty. IMO, NO ONE should be in poverty, I don't care if it's "their own fault" or not."

-Z



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (217159)2/4/2005 1:12:14 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572207
 
Z, There's nothing wrong with having 80 year olds dependent on government.

Including those 80-year-olds who spent their entire life's savings on wild living, instead of responsibly saving it up for retirement?

Yup. Just the other day I saw a grannie with an ecstasy buzz.......she was pruning her lilac bushes in the nude. I think it would be a cryin' shame if she got one penny of SS.

ted


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News