Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ask Vendit Off-Topic Questions -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Vendit™ who wrote (4586)	2/3/2005 8:51:44 PM
From: Carolyn	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 8752

Reid! He wanted LMIA, not LIMA. I know, I know - you had lima beans for dinner, didn't you?

To: Vendit™ who wrote (4586)	2/3/2005 9:02:00 PM
From: kalakoa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8752

Thanks Mr. V. Great explanation on the chart.

To: Vendit™ who wrote (4586)	2/3/2005 11:23:46 PM
From: Walkingshadow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8752

Reid, look also at each of the previous stochastic crossovers to the downside in December and January, also after the big move up in November. The pattern indeed repeats: bullish white candle, followed immediately or very shortly thereafter with a bearish stochastic crossover and correction. 139.142.147.218 Note also the predominance of wicks ABOVE rather than below the real bodies over the last several months. There is persistent distribution whenever LMIA moves up significantly. This is very likely to recur here IMHO. Based on the chart patterns and current technicals, the fact that LMIA is really in a trading range rather than a strong uptrend, and the current moderately bearish market climate, LMIA represents a pretty good short here. T