Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (28162)	2/3/2005 10:35:59 PM
From: coug	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 90947

Great post ionesco, As it spells out everything.. The unprovoked attacks, on the liberals that only want to be left alone.. As a rule we don't go into the lion's dens of rw antiquity like this one unless NEEDED.. To hopefully set them straight.. What they done to you was unexcusable, terrible to say the least. And yesterday I was also attack by the little rwe bbs that have stalked me for years. I just got fed up and then seeing what happened to you, I decided to TAKE IT TO THEM. We must have done some GOOD, the @#$%% that moderates this thread just resigned to another @##$%. He challenged me this morning but I don't have to answer him as he incriminated HIMSELF all afternoon.. I could CARE less about him. We are on the move it looks like.. There are some decent old time type conservatives here that I respect so I don't want to blow off all here. I do enjoy some of them.. I'm not taking it anymore from RWE cyber wimps.. c

To: epicure who wrote (28162)	2/3/2005 10:58:47 PM
From: Lady Lurksalot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Ionesco, Message 21008679 You have, over the years, taken leave of your once finely tuned and articulate sense of humor and have thus made yourself a target for what you complain about so vociferously. I think this may have happened about the time you so viciously attacked Michael C. over your differences in POVs WRT logging but am not really sure. Perhaps that unfortunate loss had already occurred. With all good thoughts and wishes, Holly

To: epicure who wrote (28162)	2/3/2005 11:24:13 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

You are not banned from this thread- -how else could you post?- -whereas I am banned from all your threads. And let me point out that the purpose of that post was really these words: Hi XXXXX, I worked with "other classes of people" as I toiled as a waitress and grill cook from the time I was 16. The people I met just made me convinced I wanted to go to college so that I never had to associate with their like again. They were empty, aimless and in the main highly unspiritual, unless you consider the worship of alcohol, sex and drugs a religion. I can't remember having an intellectually stimulating conversation with anyone. Of course I met idiots in college too, but a better class of idiot. And by the time I got to Berkeley I'd have to say almost all the idiots were weeded out, and that is the way I like it. Nothing wrong with being an intellectual elitist, IMO, if your tastes don't run to the plebian. My husband feels the same way about his time in the Navy. He met a guy with green teeth, and some other interesting and unsavory folks he wouldn't like to rub elbows with again The post that contains that text was from Granny to Rambi, you were mentioned incidentally in it. Are you ready to still stand by those words you wrote? Does you still think you are so superior to the rest of the world? Your garbage man may not have 7 years education past high school, but my bet is his character and ethics are superior. Incidentally, I was not "stalking", as you are so fond of calling it, you when I found that post. Neither your alias nor your real presumed real name were among the search terms. I was seeking some other information. Had I posted only that text, I had visions of being called a liar and making the text out of whole cloth. To prove it's authenticity, I posted the link. No one could question that. Be that as it may, I will not post any text or any links containing your presumed real name in the future. There are probably other posts out there containin your presumed real name. If, before opening fire, you had taken the trouble to read a few of my posts on this thread today, you might have learned that a similar thing happened to me a few years back. When I asked the persons involved to stop using my real name, they stepped it up. I then complained to Admin- -and was told to take a long walk off a short pier and that once a piece of information was put in a post on the site, it was on the site and available forever after. BTW, I remember some years back you made a great issue in Sharks of someone referring to Rambi as XXXXX and yet there you are doing it. Is this pot, kettle, black? AND, as has been asked by several other posters, how does anyone here know that is your real name even if you say it is?

To: epicure who wrote (28162)	2/4/2005 4:08:21 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

LOL! What a load of self serving crud, IMO of course <gg>. You have a long history of attacking, ridiculing, demeaning & insulting anyone who has opinions that are not in lockstep with yours. All of this has been done publicly whether you want to admit it or not. You can't make your public proclamations go away (as LL has credibly established). For example, tell me this was not a demeaning personal insult aimed directly at LL.... Message 21009718 Now anyone who pretends to be 1/2 the intellectual elite you claim to be would know full well that there are going to be plenty of folks who take issue with your POV's & your penchent for demeaning demagoguery at specific individuals, as well as wide swaths of people (not to mention your love of revisionist history). Just because you choose to ignore certain people who credibly challenge your publicly stated POV's does not mean they are harassing you. It seems to me you have attempted to avoid them, now you want to silence them because they have raised legitimate, reality based counterpoints to your version of reality. I'd say your current squaking has more to do with the fact that you are unable or unwilling to defend your meanspirited, demeaning, indefensible, & frequently unsubstantiated POV's. JMHO