SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (217261)2/4/2005 12:48:23 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572326
 
You have a link? Your the one making the extreme claim.

But if you want a link try

ltgov.state.ri.us

ltgov.state.ri.us

infoplease.com

And since you said
"What we have now is about the same percentage of the population is living beyond 70 or so as has always."

There is the simple fact that the average life expectancy used to be a lower number then my current age (36) if you go back far enough.

scb.se

Thi link includes lfe expectancy at 65, not just from birth.
efmoody.com

And then probably best of all

Table 1: Life Expectancy for Social Security

Year Cohort Turned 65 Percentage of Population Surviving from Age 21 to Age 65

ssa.gov

From 1940 to 1990 it goes from 53.9 to 72.3 in men and 60.6 to 83.6 for women.

It took me two minutes to get all of that from google. I think your educated enough to already know the general facts (without the specific details like exact life expectancy and exact %'s living to specific ages), and to know that it would not be hard to find supporting info. I wonder why you even bother with the "Got a link?" Finding a link is just too easy, and my point would be just as true if I didn't know how to use a search engine.

Tim



To: combjelly who wrote (217261)2/4/2005 2:31:56 AM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572326
 
cj,

Maybe you meant this link:

For example, in the United States the raw average life expectancy over the past 100 years has increased by over 50%. However, the age adjusted expectancy for 60 year old persons, has only increased 10%. This means that the improvements in medical technology have done much to decrease mortality among the young, but relatively little to help the elderly. In other words, although the odds of living to old age have increased, the maximum probable lifespan has not changed dramatically.
en.wikipedia.org

Joe