Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Microcaps -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gulo who wrote (422)	2/4/2005 2:30:47 AM
From: Taikun	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 817

Gulo, I'm fully aware of the image CWPC has. Over time, though, this asset, if it is economic, will not just 'sit there'. Eventually it will be put to work. It will be CWPC or a partnership or a sellout, perhaps. From their website: There are three known prospective targets to drill test on the Firebag East Project covering some five townships at this time. The potential pay zones encountered from the previous drill cores and logs are as thick as 150 feet in the Wabiskaw formation and 58 feet in the Fort McMurray formation with several drill hole intersections grading better than 7% oil by weight. The best grades encountered have been from a 20-foot interval in the Fort McMurray formation from 628 to 648 feet in drill hole 7-11-95-25-W3M, which graded 9.1% oil by weight with 36% porosity and 47% oil saturation. Within this interval, the best core sample was 11.5% oil by weight and 63.9% oil saturation. For reference, normal cut off grades for Athabasca Oil Sands SAGD production is 7% oil by weight, 30% porosity and 60% oil saturation, indicating that the Firebag East Project has world-class exploration potential. This leads me to believe the asset is economic, location in Sask notwithstanding. What do you say to this report? apioil.net David