SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (22863)2/4/2005 9:14:05 AM
From: russwinter  Respond to of 116555
 
More great Bubble news for Bully, as he don't need no stinkin' job.



To: mishedlo who wrote (22863)2/4/2005 9:15:25 AM
From: zonder  Respond to of 116555
 
US Employment Growth Disappoints - Again

............................................Jan...................Dec
Nonfarm payrolls..............146k...................133k (r from 157k)
Unemployment rate..............5.2%...................5.4%
Ave. Hourly Earnings..............0.2%...................0.1%

US employment growth once again failed to deliver the strong profile that
many analysts have been anticipating. Across the board, employment growth
was positive - with the exception of manufacturing which reflected its
secular trend with a contraction of 25k.Only one month in the last six has
recorded over 200k growth in overall payrolls. This tells us that the
economy still has a substantial degree of slack in the labour market. At the
same time earnings growth remains moderate - the 0.2% growth in January,
following 0.1% in the previous month. In the more dynamic part of the last
cycle (second half of the 1990s) nonfarm payrolls were growing on average
above 220k per month. There is some way to go to approach that rate.

Conclusion: Does the Fed need to accelerate or decelerate the pace of
interest rate increases as a result of this evidence from the labour market?
No - we do not believe so. The data is strong enough to encourage a gradual
move towards a neutral rate but not strong enough to prompt any aggression
in the pace of tightening.



To: mishedlo who wrote (22863)2/4/2005 9:19:41 AM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116555
 
While we differ greatly on the reasons (deflation fears versus CB manipulation) you have been right as rain on long-term treasury bonds. I still expect the situation to shift dramatically before long however.