Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (28232)	2/4/2005 9:48:11 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

LOL!! Laz would have to use a wide angle lens to "focus" on you.....you know, its really NOT all about you.....J.

To: epicure who wrote (28232)	2/4/2005 10:52:16 AM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

<<I can do to get him to agree to stop posting about me, I will do it.>> Anything?

To: epicure who wrote (28232)	2/4/2005 2:00:10 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

Let me point out first that you chose to break the truce that Dave and I requested. You take the consequences. Let's gets down to brass tacks. Any poster on this site is free to post about any other. Or so is my understanding of the rules; I sometimes get the impression they change randomly at whim. When I posted that link, I was perfectly justified and within the TOU as they had been previously explained to me. The fact that Admin decided to make an unannounced change in the interpretation (which is actually more important than the actual text) of the TOU is not my fault. The previous rule, as explained to me by Admin, was that once a post was on SI's disks it was forever available and could be used from then on. And it was explained to me in a different inquiry that changing from your real name as an SI alias to an obvious alias offered exactly ZERO protection against your real name being used later. As far as concentrating on you, you far overestimate your importance. I freely will allow you or Admin to scan or search all my posts for references to you. I fear you will be severely disappointed by your unimportance. Prepare yourself for an ego blow. We are well aware of just how large that ego is; you've made it apparent on numerous occasions. If you dispute that, I will prove it. As far as being a target, you are hardly the only one. I am too. In fact, I can come with slaps to me on threads that I am banned from. I have no chance to defend myself. You are not banned from here and I will give you a personal guarantee you won't be, in spite of some calls for just that in my inbox. If Dave will tolerate you, I will. She who is without sin, let her cast the first stone. You've certainly written enough ill of me. I will allow you to reply to this, then I suggest we drop the matter. I will not respond to your post unless you challenge an assertion and I must produce proof and then I will limit my reply to that and hopefully we will be done. I also request the rest of the thread to drop the matter.