SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (217575)2/5/2005 1:53:00 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573824
 
We spent 2.6 trillion dollars on defense in 2005

Ted you are losing it.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you either mean that we are going to spend that much on defense in 2005 or that we spent that much in 2004. Even then your statement is still crazy. $2.6 trillion is more than the entire 2005 budget, and is more thant the whole world will spend on defense in 2005.

"President Bush’s budget includes $401.7 billion for the Department of Defense"

...

"The president's $2.4 trillion budget for FY 2005"

aapmr.org



To: tejek who wrote (217575)2/5/2005 2:51:41 AM
From: Raymond Duray  Respond to of 1573824
 
Ted,

Re: We spent 2.6 trillion dollars on defense in 2005

The entire federal budget for FY 2005 was about $2.5 Trillion. I think you might want to review this data.



To: tejek who wrote (217575)2/6/2005 4:25:14 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1573824
 
"Again social security spending is noticeably larger."

It is? How can that be when what's coming in currently is more than what's going out.


Because no matter how much is coming in, even if it was 10^100^100 dollars, money is still being spent on social security and that money is more then the defense budget.

I show the 2005 budget line item for SS was $443K.

Social Security probably spends more than that on office supplies.

Tim