Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Srexley who wrote (671302)	2/6/2005 8:27:03 AM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

I supported the war, but why do you use the word "treasonous." If "the reason" to go to war was to protect America from Saddam's WMDs and then it turns out there are none and now 1,000 plus Americans are dead and the cost to the nation is $XXXX,XXXX,XXXX,XXXX (gigantic), what's treasonous about suggesting the American people have been duped, or to say, "Hold on, what the f*ck is going on. Does the President and the people he listens to know what is going on?" Isn't it fair, in the light of all the false reasons we went to war for some people to be dubious of the President's actions to some degree. Or do you feel the President can go to war for stated X and X reason, but in reality go to war for reasons unstated.