SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (98819)2/5/2005 3:03:13 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 793690
 
Either the parties have the specified feature in common or they don't.

When the specified feature is "propaganda", as it was in Shafer's little tantrum, every single word you say has entirely different meaning, history, context and connotation for the creation of a totalitarian personality cult when compared to the persuasions of an elected president to the electorate that will have its chance to vote him out of office. To use the same word "propaganda" to link those two entirely different worlds with entirely different means and ends, not to contrast them, but to try to blur the differences and insinuate that Bush is fomenting a personality cult just like Kim Jong Il, is odious from start to finish. And that's what Shafer did.

It's not the same "specified feature". Not even remotely close.



To: Lane3 who wrote (98819)2/5/2005 5:22:17 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793690
 
Are you trying to claim that you thought he was just comparing them on one trait? Read the opening sentence.

If "Dear Leader" Kim Jong-il of North Korea and George W. Bush ever meet, I suspect the two will bond like long-lost brothers

slate.msn.com [I included this URL in the original post]

This was a deliberate smear job. You will never convince me that you didn't know it.