Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (95669)	2/6/2005 6:43:06 PM
From: Krowbar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Hawks going green 11:07 AM CST on Saturday, February 5, 2005 Robert Bryce / The Dallas Morning News President Bush has a simple policy regarding energy: Produce more of it. The former oilman has packed his administration with veterans of the oil and coal industries. And for most of the first Bush term, his energy policy and his foreign policy were joined at the hip. Since the administration believed that controlling the flow of oil from the Persian Gulf was critically important to the U.S. economy, the invasion of Iraq seemed to serve both the president's energy goals and his foreign policy ones. But a curious transformation is occurring in Washington: a split of foreign policy and energy policy. Many of the leading neoconservatives who pushed hard for the Iraq war are going green. James Woolsey, the former director of the Central Intelligence Agency and a staunch backer of the Iraq war, now drives a 58-miles-per-gallon Toyota Prius and has two more hybrid vehicles on order. Frank Gaffney, the president of the Center for Security Policy and another neocon who championed the war, has been speaking regularly in Washington about fuel efficiency and plant-based fuels. The alliance of hawks and environmentalists is new but not entirely surprising. The environmentalists are worried about global warming and air pollution. But Mr. Woolsey and Mr. Gaffney – both members of the Project for the New American Century, which began advocating military action against Saddam Hussein back in 1998 – are going green for geopolitical reasons, not environmental ones. They seek to reduce the flow of American dollars to oil-rich Islamic theocracies, Saudi Arabia in particular. They say oil dollars have made Saudi Arabia too rich a source of terrorist funding and Islamic radicals. Mr. Gaffney recently pointed out that America has become dependent on oil imported from countries that "by and large are hostile to us." This fact, he said, makes reducing oil imports "a national security imperative." Neocons and greens first hitched up in the fall, when they jointly backed a proposal by the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, a Washington-based think tank that tracks energy and security issues. The plan proposes that the federal government invest $12 billion to encourage automakers to build more efficient cars and consumers to buy them; develop industrial facilities to produce plant-based fuels such as ethanol; and promote fuel cells for commercial use. The plan is keen on "plug-in hybrid vehicles," which use internal combustion engines along with electric motors charged by standard electric outlets. Environmental groups, who have been in the weeds ever since George W. Bush moved in to 1600 Pennsylvania, are happy for any help they can get. "It's a wonderful confluence. We agree on the same goals, even if it's for different reasons," says Deron Lovaas, the National Resources Defense Council's point man on auto issues. For Mr. Woolsey and Mr. Gaffney, the fact that energy efficiency and conservation might help the environment is an unintended side benefit. They want to weaken the Saudis, the Iranians and the Syrians while also strengthening the Israelis. Whether these ends are achieved with M-16s or hybrid automobiles doesn't seem to matter to them. They aren't the only Iraq hawks who have joined the cause. Among others, the Committee on the Present Danger is about to join the Prius-and-ethanol crowd. A driving force for America's military buildup since the '50s now reconstituted as an anti-terror group, the committee will issue a paper in the next few months endorsing much of the IAGS plan. Despite the setbacks in Iraq, the green neocons believe they can persuade Congress and the White House to adopt their program. If they can persuade Congress and the White House. My comment. You mean that the liberals were right after all, and we could decrease our dependence on Mid-East oil, and thus our security, by driving hybrid cars, conservation, and using alternative energy, instead of by military action? Who knew that those who were portrayed as tree hugging morons by right wingers were right after all. Del