SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rrufff who wrote (90811)2/6/2005 9:12:50 AM
From: rrufff  Respond to of 122087
 
U.S., Canadian regulators charge trio of hedge fund managers

By MICHAEL FLAHERTY
From Saturday's Globe and Mail

U.S. and Canadian regulators have charged three hedge fund managers
with insider stock trading violations as part of an investigation
launched last spring into a string of alleged short-selling abuses.

Maryland-based CompuDyne Corp. said this week it recently learned that
former investor Hilary Shane faces National Association of Securities
Dealers charges of violating securities laws in a financing deal the
security company did in October of 2001.

Ms. Shane, a former hedge fund manager at First New York Securities
LLC, made $1.1-million (U.S.) from inside information of the deal,
according to an NASD complaint filed in late December.

Michael Finkelstein and Elizabeth Leonard of Toronto-based Stonestreet
LP face similar charges by the Investment Dealers Association, a
Canadian self-regulatory group.

The charges come less than a year after the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission and brokerages watchdog NASD pursued allegations
of hedge funds profiting from inside knowledge of private investments
in public equity, a transaction known as a PIPE.

PIPEs help cash-strapped companies raise money quickly by selling
discount-priced shares to a group of investors. The stock of a company
conducting a PIPE usually falls in the short-term because the
transaction floods the market with additional shares.

Regulators are investigating whether individuals who helped finance a
PIPE profited from selling short the company's shares before the deal
closed, knowing its stock was about to fall.

Ms. Shane, who left First New York in 2002, is accused of doing
exactly that.

Short sellers borrow shares of a company and then sell them in
anticipation of a decline. They profit when the stock falls since they
can buy back the shares at a lower price and pocket the difference.

In September, 2001, a representative at investment bank Friedman
Billings Ramsey Group Inc. contacted Ms. Shane about doing a PIPE with
CompuDyne, according to the NASD complaint.

The complaint says Ms. Shane made false representations about her
investment intent, obtained the right to acquire 475,000 shares of
CompuDyne and then engaged in unlawful insider trading by selling the
company's stock short while in possession of material, non-public
information.

First New York has not been charged in relation to the case. Ms. Shane
could not be reached for comment.

The complaint does not list charges against FBR Group and a FBR Group
spokesman declined to comment further.

Mr. Finkelstein and Ms. Leonard face similar charges stemming from a
PIPE involving Novatel Wireless Inc. in 2001, and another with Trikon
Technologies Inc. a year later.

Stonestreet LP's website lists Mr. Finkelstein and Ms. Leonard as
officers of the investment firm. The IDA complaint says Stonestreet
maintains a non-client account at Canaccord Capital Corp.'s Toronto
office that operates as a hedge fund, which Mr. Finkelstein and Ms.
Leonard co-manage.

The fund would hedge against its anticipated investment in a PIPE by
"shorting the issuer's underlying stock," according to the complaint
that was filed on Jan. 7.

Reached by telephone at Stonestreet, Mr. Finkelstein said he would not
comment. Ms. Leonard could not be reached.

Reuters News Agency



To: rrufff who wrote (90811)2/6/2005 12:50:58 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
Most lawsuits are filed in the same town as the company, which just so happens to be Nevada and Florida. The rationale for jurisdiction, i.e. a point of contact, is the Internet. I've yet to see anyone who tried to get off on jurisdiction not succeed. With the exception of Michael Zwebner*, I can't recall any companies refiling lawsuits in other jurisdictions once they are dismissed.

- Jeff

* I suppose you could also throw Ziasun in there