Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (99037)	2/7/2005 7:32:55 AM
From: kumar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793670

apologies, think of a word different from "vendetta". Democratically held, freely held elections do not belong with that word.

To: Lane3 who wrote (99037)	2/7/2005 12:21:18 PM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793670

Who cares ? He contested, he lost. The electorate has spoken with their votes. The word for it is "vendetta," one of the fundamental, sustaining, life energies. Karen and Kumar, It was Tim Russert (who is certainly not a Republican operative) who resurrected the Form 180 issue. It was Kerry who said he'd sign the form. Now, apparently, Don Imus (again, not a Republican operative) raised the issue with Kerry. Kerry ensured that this issue will stay in the spotlight by saying he would sign the 180. He could have done as Kumar suggested, and say, "the election is over, it's not relevant, and I'm not going to discuss it," but he did not. He said he'd sign the Form. What am I missing?