SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (99080)2/7/2005 11:52:50 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793721
 
Education should be a private function. Because otherwise, we have the absurd situation where the courts dictate what we teach our children. I understand the situation perfectly thank you very much.



To: Ilaine who wrote (99080)2/7/2005 12:22:59 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 793721
 

It's ok to teach creation in religious schools.


I watched To The Contrary yesterday morning. They had a segment on abstinence-only sex ed. There was a clip of a teacher lecturing that there were three reasons not to be sexually active. One was the physical danger, the second was risk to self esteem, and the third was spiritual risk. He described the first two in some detail. For the third he simply said that the risk was serious, but that he couldn't talk about it in a public school so kids should check the appropriate source. I thought he handled it pretty deftly, considering, but it's still awkward to teach that way.



To: Ilaine who wrote (99080)2/8/2005 10:59:42 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793721
 
Because there is no scientific evidence of creation. Hence, teaching creation is teaching religion.

Without the theological component its pseudo science but not really religion.

Tim