Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (99084)	2/7/2005 12:21:46 PM
From: D. Long	Respond to of 793652

From what I have read, Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard (TANG) has been the subject of intense scrutiny since he first ran for governor in Texas. How long ago was that? 20 years? (Edit: 1994 was the first election. I thought he ran for something earlier than that.) He unsuccessfully ran for Congress in the 80s, I believe. Derek

To: Ilaine who wrote (99084)	2/7/2005 12:28:29 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793652

From what I have read, Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard (TANG) has been the subject of intense scrutiny since he first ran for governor in Texas. How long ago was that? 20 years? (Edit: 1994 was the first election. I thought he ran for something earlier than that.) George Bush won re-election. He is my President. I am not here to rehash this stuff to hurt my President. I am interested in getting to MSM. They are weak. They didn't get to Bill Clinton and Jennifer Flowers. I didn't see Bill Clinton with Jennifer Flowers, but I know what went on. In the same way, I have no proof George Bush did not serve in the Alabama National Guard where he was assigned for over one year, but I know he did not serve. Both Presidents were re-elected. Good for them. They are not going to lose their place in history because of these two items. But, there is something wrong with MSM when they can't get these simple stories straight. And that is a much bigger problem. As for Dan Rather, I never thought he was very smart. I never thought he was a good news person. But I am sure he did not forge any documents.