SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DizzyG who wrote (671493)2/7/2005 1:45:14 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769667
 
Yes, Diz, I both read and posted here the corrected article when it came out:

"What Bush did not detail is how contributions in the account would reduce workers' monthly Social Security checks. Under the system, described by an administration official, every dollar contributed to an account would be taken from the guaranteed Social Security benefit, with interest."

"The person comes out ahead if their personal account exceeds a 3 percent real rate of return, which is the rate of return that the trust fund bonds receive," the senior administration official said. "So, basically, the net effect on an individual's benefits would be zero if his personal account earned a 3 percent real rate of return. To the extent that his personal account gets a higher rate of return, his net benefit would increase."

So, in essense what they are saying is that 100% of the investment risk of any 'private accounts' would stay with the individual (ie, if your account under-performed the traditional accounts it's 'tough luck'....)

But, to the extent that your account performed better then the expected real return rate of Treasuries of 3% (even though the SS administration actually only projects a 2.4% real return on the projected period... because they are not projecting that the markets will be that robust), that extra gain that is above the 3% compounded return rate would belong to the individual account holder --- unless Congress enacted taxes on any 'excess returns'.



To: DizzyG who wrote (671493)2/7/2005 4:34:41 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
What the post leaves out and Buddy wont admit is even if it BROKE EVEN the OWNER of the plan THE INDIVIDUAL could leave ANY UNDRAWN PROCEEDS to his HEIRS. Both my mother and my father died at age 62 and we received $250 TOTAL from each. One of my brothers died at 56 and we received $250. Does anyone think THEY benefitted by the GOVT. owning the plan? jdn