Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: olivier asser who wrote (90831)	2/7/2005 10:14:29 PM
From: Tommy Hicks	Respond to of 122087

Jeez, the baby boomers will be dying off soon. Energy companies, pharmaceuticals and crematoriums in Florida will be the “slow” boom. Google will be something I try to remember when I gum my food. th

To: olivier asser who wrote (90831)	2/8/2005 3:29:11 PM
From: StockDung	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 122087

Google: $1 Trillion? By David Forrest (TMF Bogey) February 8, 2005 Blurb: $1 trillion If you're in the camp that has a hard time seeing these Rule Breakers of the world, I'm sure it's going to come as a huge shock to you when I say that I believe 20 years from now, we'll be looking back at Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG) paltry $53 billion market cap and say, "Gosh, if only I had invested in Google back then." Google will be a $1 trillion company, at least. Sure, shake your head. But what does $1 trillion really mean in terms of future stock price appreciation? About 16% annually for the next 20 years. Find that hard to believe? I don't. Microsoft has annualized around 35% per year since 1986, most of that growth coming in the earliest days. Outrageous positioning? You better believe it. Google is quite simply the most dominant company of the day. Their success and dominance is right here in front of our faces, and yet the popular media (and perhaps even some fellow Fools) are calling it overpriced or "priced for perfection." That's fine -- I say that they will be perfect. Fair enough? fool.com