SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (218099)2/8/2005 12:39:11 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575424
 
Iran looks, again, to 'experienced captain'

Mon Feb 7, 7:17 AM ET Top Stories - USATODAY.com


By Barbara Slavin, USA TODAY

Somehow, most of the tangled strands of the U.S.-Iran relationship have wound up in his hands.

Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, 70, was Iran's president from 1989 to 1997. In 1985, he helped arrange a clandestine deal with the Reagan administration, a trade of U.S. arms for Iran's help in freeing Americans held hostage by Iranian-backed militants in Lebanon. A decade later, Rafsanjani brokered a multibillion-dollar deal with Conoco that could have marked a turning point in U.S.-Iranian relations - until President Clinton (news - web sites) blocked it under pressure from the Republican-led Congress. (Related item: Text of Rafsanjani interview)

Now, Rafsanjani is poised to take power again. Though he hasn't agreed to run, he is the consensus front-runner for Iran's presidential election June 17. His son, Mehdi Hashemi, says his father wants to "solve the American problem. Because if he solves the American problem, he solves all Iranian problems."

A midlevel cleric from a pistachio-growing family in Rafsanjan in south-central Iran, Rafsanjani (Iranians often make their hometown part of their names) has been a pivotal figure for the past quarter-century. He is a master politician who has used power, skill and luck to become one of the most powerful figures in Iran. (Related story: Ex-leader: Iran, U.S. can agree)

In 1981, he left a room at the headquarters of the ruling Islamic Republican Party just before a bomb planted by an Islamic-Marxist opposition group exploded and killed 74 officials, including a cleric who was then the second most powerful man in Iran, after Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the 1979 revolution.

Now Rafsanjani is arguably the second most powerful man in the country, behind the current supreme religious leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, a former president whom Rafsanjani helped anoint after Khomeini's death in 1989.

Rafsanjani is credited with persuading Khomeini to accept a cease-fire in the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq (news - web sites) War, which killed or injured 750,000 Iranians. Relatively liberal on the issue of personal freedoms, he is pro-business and pro-foreign investment, in part because he and his family have profited from deals in oil, automobiles and airlines.

His son, interviewed here last week, says the family is not eager to see Rafsanjani run again because "we have everything" already. But Iran needs him again, Hashemi says.

Indeed, these are uncertain times for Iran. The United States and Israel are threatening military action if Iran does not give up its nuclear program. Tens of thousands of U.S. troops are across Iran's borders in Afghanistan (news - web sites) and Iraq. And Iranian hard-liners are trying to reinvigorate a faded revolution, in part by defying the United States over the nuclear program.

Rafsanjani's family is not alone in predicting a comeback for him. Rafsanjani "is an experienced captain at a time of turbulence in the sea," says Nasser Hadian, a professor of political science at Tehran University.

Rafat Bayot, an independent member of parliament from Zanjan province west of Tehran, calls Rafsanjani "very smart, very brave and one of the pillars of the revolution" who can deal with internal and external threats.

Rafsanjani also has a dark side. He has been linked in the Iranian press to the killings of dissidents during his presidential terms.

In 2000, Rafsanjani ran last in parliamentary elections for a seat from Tehran after a journalist, Akbar Ganji, accused him of involvement in the deaths of 80 writers and dissidents. Rafsanjani and his family deny the accusations. But a former intelligence officer who could have testified against him, Saeed Emami, died in prison under suspicious circumstances in 1999. Ganji was sentenced last year to 10 years in prison for "spreading propaganda about the Islamic regime."

In an interview, Rafsanjani's brother, Mohammed Hashemi, said most of the murders of dissidents occurred under Rafsanjani's successor, the current president, Mohammad Khatami (news - web sites). But Mohsen Kadivar, a reformist cleric and Khatami supporter, says the murders started under Rafsanjani. Among the victims was an Iranian intellectual, Ali Akbar Saidi Sirjani, who died in prison in 1994.

Iran's cleric-run government has long taken an aggressive line toward Israel and the United States as well as Iranian dissidents. It has backed operatives and terrorist groups that have carried out attacks outside Iran's borders - controversial actions that occurred on Rafsanjani's watch.

For example, an arrest warrant was issued in Germany in 1996 for Rafsanjani's intelligence minister, Ali Fallahian, for organizing the assassination of three Kurdish dissidents in Berlin in 1992. Rafsanjani was also president in 1994, when Iranian agents blew up a Jewish cultural center in Buenos Aires, Argentina, killing more than 80 people, and in 1996, when Iranian-backed Saudi Shiite terrorists blew up the Khobar Towers housing complex in Saudi Arabia, killing 19 American airmen. Iran's alleged involvement in the Khobar Towers attack is one of many reasons for deep hostility toward Iran among U.S. government officials.

Meanwhile, however, the first reformist newspaper in Islamic Iran, Salaam, was begun during Rafsanjani's tenure, Kadivar says, and during his presidency, the regime eased its grip on culture and the private lives of its citizens.



Rafsanjani "is better than the conservatives," Kadivar says. He and other reformists say that only Rafsanjani is strong enough to counterbalance Khamenei and the hard-liners who swept to power in parliamentary elections last year after reformists were barred from participating.

Ironically, Rafsanjani had a hand in that victory by the conservatives. After being attacked by reformists over the murders of dissidents, he lent his considerable backing to the hard-liners in their move to bar reformist candidates. But he has a chameleon-like ability to avoid being pegged as a hard-liner himself.

"The only choice that would push Iran toward moderation is Rafsanjani," says Mohammed Atrianfar, chief editorial director of Shargh, a reform-leaning newspaper here that is strongly supporting a Rafsanjani candidacy.

Rafsanjani's son says that, if elected, his father will change Iran's constitution to reduce the power of Iran's supreme religious leader and make the position a ceremonial role akin to "the king of England."

Hashemi also says that only his father can prevent the country from losing any semblance of pluralism, albeit within a small religious-backed elite.

"If my father doesn't run, all of the country will be under one group, and after that we won't have any free elections," he says.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (218099)2/8/2005 4:54:50 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575424
 
Oil companies impatient for 'new Iraq'

By United Press International

BAGHDAD, Feb. 7 (UPI) -- As the cameras roll, Iraq's Oil Minister Thamer Ghadban announces that he will build a new database mapping the country's lucrative oil reserves.

Waiters in white shirts and bow ties bear cookies and Cokes on silver trays into the glassed-in conference room on the sixth floor of the former Defense Ministry building. Female data entry workers, their heads covered by colorful scarves, stand patiently outside the room, smiling at all of the fuss.

This is the face of an elite Iraq that few get to see. Foreign companies invite oil officials to neighboring Jordan to cut deals, since it's considered too dangerous for CEOs to travel to Iraq, ministry officials say privately. But the prospective oil wealth waiting just under the surface is luring international oil giants to offer computers, trips, training, and possibly cold, hard cash.

Exploration Consultants Ltd., of London, donated the $250,000 database system and the training to run it. In recent months British Petroleum-Amoco, ChevronTexaco and others have invited select groups of engineers and others across the world to learn about developments in the past 10 years in oil exploration and drilling. Iraq workers were isolated from the world during 12 years of international sanctions following the 1991 Gulf War.

"This will make us able to solve technical problems ourselves," Ghadban said of the new database system. "We will become self-sufficient and be able to manage production. This will help us work better with foreign companies."

But the threat of violence is real to foreigners and Iraqis alike. Insurgents blow up pipelines somewhere around the country almost daily. They killed 12 Iraq troops affiliated with a special pipeline security battalion 1,500-strong near the northern oil city of Kirkuk last week.

Getting to see the minister means dealing with four sets of guards, a pat-down search and walks through two metal detectors. Instead, most companies send the $5,000 in earnest money required to bid on new projects and lobby oil officials until they hear back, Ahmed al-Shamma, a deputy minister, said recently.

The biggest prize? A possible $3 billion contract to build a new "super refinery" producing gasoline and other oil products from up to 1 million barrels per day of Iraq crude, said a senior U.S. Embassy official in Baghdad, declining to be named. An announcement could come by the end of the month; building a new refinery could take more than two years.

Companies such as Shell, Exxon and Chevron are offering all sorts of pot sweeteners to get on a refinery short list, the official said. Each one wants a "one-off" production-sharing agreement that will make it worthwhile to deal with the volatility in Iraq, including a still-changing government.

Instead, U.S. advisers are recommending that the government write a petroleum law to keep things open and transparent. "One-off" deals create conditions that encourage corruption, the official said.

"If we go contract by contract, other companies will out-bribe the United States companies, and we will lose," the official said. "We want an fair, open, equal process, and U.S. companies have better technology."

No foreign company can own land or extract natural resources under rules written by U.S. administrators after U.S. troops came into the country in April 2003.

Also still up for discussion are existing extraction contracts such as one signed by former president Saddam Hussein with Russian giant Lukoil, which has now been joined by ConocoPhillips. The current interim government has said that contract is void, but a newly elected parliament expected to be seated by the end of the month, may think otherwise. Other deals are still up for grabs.

In the meantime, Ghadban and an interim government "ministers' council" have approved at least six smaller refineries in recent weeks. A 30,000 barrel-per-day "package refinery" will be built in Koysenja near the northern city of Suleiymania, officials say. Another one is slated for Koya, nearby. In northern Mosul, where recent fighting kept some polls closed on Election Day, a refinery is planned to deal with crude reserves, said Asim Jihad, an oil ministry spokesman.

In the south, a new 10,000 barrel-per-day refinery recently came online in Nasriyah. A 230,000 barrel-per-day refinery is to be built in Najaf, a Shiite Muslim religious site, and another in Musayab.

Iraq's three workhorse refineries in northern Beiji, central Daura and southern Basra currently process less than 500,000 barrels per day of crude oil, leading, in part to gasoline shortages around the country. Long lines of cars at gas stations continue to plague the capital.

But many say the lines are caused by smugglers taking Iraq's heavily subsidized gasoline to other countries, since Iraq is currently importing up to $200 million per month in gas and other oil products. Consumers pay about a penny for a liter of gas at the pump.

interestalert.com



To: RetiredNow who wrote (218099)2/8/2005 6:49:44 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575424
 
Religious Hatred, Saudi-Style
by Jeff Jacoby
Feb 07, '05 / 28 Shevat 5765

In which country are Muslims being taught the following lessons?

+ "Everyone who does not embrace Islam is an unbeliever and must be called an unbeliever.... One who does not call the Jews and the Christians unbelievers is himself an unbeliever."

+ "Whoever believes that churches are houses of God... or that what Jews and Christians do constitutes the worship of God... is an infidel."

+ To offer greetings to a Christian at Christmas -- even to wish "Happy holidays" -- is "a practice more loathsome to God... than imbibing liquor, or murder, or fornication."

+ Jews "are worse than donkeys." They are the corrupting force "behind materialism, bestiality, the destruction of the family, and the dissolution of society."

+ Muslims who convert to another religion "should be killed because [they] have denied the Koran."

+ Democracy is "responsible for all the horrible wars" of the 20th century, and for spreading "ignorance, moral decadence, and drugs."

If this sounds to you like the kind of fanaticism you might encounter in Saudi Arabia -- where the established creed is Wahhabism, an intolerant and extremist version of Islam -- you're right. Unfortunately, this religious hatred isn't confined to the Arabian peninsula. Thanks to the Saudi government's elaborate campaign to export Wahhabism worldwide, such anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, anti-Western poison can also be found throughout the United States.

We know this from the work of Freedom House, a venerable human rights group that promotes democracy around the globe. In a new report, it documents the alarming degree to which Wahhabist propaganda has penetrated American mosques.

Between November 2003 and December 2004, Freedom House researchers assembled more than 200 publications from 15 mosques and Islamic centers in Illinois, Texas, California, New York, New Jersey, Virginia and Washington, DC. All the documents were linked to the Saudi religious establishment -- many were official Saudi government publications or had been supplied by the Saudi embassy, and several of the mosques disseminating them are funded by the Saudi royal family. Each was reviewed by independent translators, who found them replete with what Freedom House calls "a totalitarian ideology of hatred that can incite to violence."

Before September 11, 2001, the notion that literature in mosques could be dangerous might have struck some as alarmist. But of the 19 terrorist-hijackers that day, 15 were Saudi, and all of them were steeped in the relentless hostility to "infidels" that the Saudi publications inculcate. For some, the mosques were a crucial resource. The King Fahd Mosque in Los Angeles, for example, was a home away from home for hijackers Nawaf Al-Hazmi and Khalid Al-Mihdhar. The mosque's imam, Fahad Al-Thumairy, was an accredited Saudi diplomat in Los Angeles until 2003, when he was expelled from the United States for suspected involvement in terrorism.

Perhaps Hazmi and Mihdhar spent some of their time at the mosque studying "Loyalty and Dissociation in Islam," a Wahhabi work that emphasizes the duty of every Muslim to cultivate enmity between themselves and non-Muslims. "Be dissociated from the infidels," the book instructs. "Hate them for their religion, leave them, never rely on them for support, do not admire them, and always oppose them in every way according to Islamic law."

Or perhaps they consulted "Religious Edicts for the Immigrant Muslim." As Nina Shea of Freedom House observes, they would have found in its pages detailed instructions for intensifying their resentment of Americans: "Never greet the Christian or Jew first. Never congratulate the infidel on his holiday. Never befriend an infidel unless it is to convert him. Never imitate the infidel. Never work for an infidel. Do not wear a graduation gown because this imitates the infidel."

It is important to note that most Muslims do not share the xenophobic Wahhabi dogma. Freedom House undertook its study in part because "many Muslims... requested our help in exposing Saudi extremism in the hope of freeing their communities from ideological strangulation." Now that Freedom House has done so, it is up to moderate American Muslims to purge their mosques of the Saudi toxin, and to ostracize the extremists in their midst.

And it is up to Washington to put an end to the pretense of US-Saudi harmony. In his State of the Union address last week, President Bush referred to Saudi Arabia as one of "our friends" in the Middle East. But friends don't flood friends' houses of worship with hateful religious propaganda. We are in a war against radical Islamist terrorism, and Saudi Arabia supplies the ideology on which the terrorists feed. Until that incitement is stifled, the Saudis are no friends of ours.

[This article originally appeared in the Boston Globe on Sunday, February 6, 2005.]



To: RetiredNow who wrote (218099)2/8/2005 7:53:23 PM
From: Taro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575424
 
MM,
your comments here are right on and a no brainer. How could anybody disagree with that?

Taro