Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (99277)	2/8/2005 9:51:21 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793625

Not what I read. Just the opposite. Where did you pick that up? She said the words on the document were her bosses known sentiments You are right about one thing. Mighty curious why CBS has turned so incurious about the story. In any case, there has to be an audit trail. Who handed the documents over. Where did they get the document?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (99277)	2/8/2005 11:29:26 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793625

There were no "text files" in use by the TANG in the early 1970's. Surely you remember back to the days before computers. What they had was typewriters. Which produced documents by keys striking ribbons, which left an ink impression on paper. I gather that you're trying to argue that the substance of the memos was accurate, even though the documents themselves were forged. Given that the man in question is dead, and left no documents about the topic, we're stuck with "he said, she said". Such are the vicissitudes of history.