SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ish who wrote (99355)2/8/2005 4:58:20 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793755
 
Ish, did you see the information that for 4 1/2 BILLION we could give EVERY small farmer an annual income of 35,000 and they dont raise ANYTHING. Yet we are spending 14+ Billion and frankly the small farmer is going the way of the goony bird. Its DAMN OBVIOUS to me that the big companies who need no help are scoffing up all the bucks. The whole thing is wasteful. I am ALL FOR supporting the small farmer but not the big business combines. jdn



To: Ish who wrote (99355)2/8/2005 5:27:25 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793755
 

A lot of little farmers would go broke, banks would be repossessing land with falling value. John Deere, IH, Cat would all be losing sales and laying off. People on welfare don't pay much in taxes.


That's the fear. I could use the same analogy as you have to defend subsidies to the Restaurant industry, etc, if we had them. It's hard to get off the government teat.

A "Small Farmer" goes out of business, and people shed tears and have fundraisers. A guy goes under at his hot dog stand, nobody gives a shit.



To: Ish who wrote (99355)2/8/2005 7:51:42 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793755
 
I think the subsidies should be phased out but they should be eliminated. If the change happens slowly you give people time to adapt. No matter how long they have some, perhaps many farmers will go out of business but that frees them (or those who would have followed them) up to do other things. Its the "creative destruction" of capitalism.

Tim