Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (60206)	2/8/2005 5:48:03 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Respond to of 74559

Jay, It sounds a good trick to absorb radar signals in a micro-thin film. < "The plasma generator would envelop the aircraft in a film of ionized gas, which would be impervious to radar pulses, theoretically rendering the warplane electronically 'invisible'" ... > Perhaps the skin of the aircraft/missile would be like shark skin and the radar would go into the little hollows where the plasma is lurking. It would be better to find a way to get along with neighbours instead of attacking them. But while feather duster manoeuvres are planned, I suppose anti-radar plasma is necessary. Mqurice PS: Google has a lot on this stuff. I guess hiding from radar has been popular since WWII and all tricks are considered.