Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: twmoore who wrote (9828)	2/9/2005 3:12:24 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Respond to of 20039

tw, Re: .Someone should try to chase down who is behind this article. The editor of Popular Mechanics seems to be someone who is already enamored of military hardware and does a good job of showcasing that in the publication.

To: twmoore who wrote (9828)	2/9/2005 5:46:48 AM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

twmoore > Someone should try to chase down who is behind this article Who do you have in mind? ME?!

To: twmoore who wrote (9828)	2/11/2005 10:22:15 AM
From: sea_urchin	Respond to of 20039

twmoore > Someone should try to chase down who is behind this article (2) rense.com This is the picture of the president and CEO of Hearst Corporation, Victor F. Ganzi, which owns Popular Mechanics: hearstcorp.com >>I feel Mr Hoffman was dealing with this particular issue at the wrong level. Approached from a different angle the article tells us who really was behind 9/11 and who is still desperately trying to cover it up. In-Q-Tel? It is described as "A new partnership between the CIA and the 'private sector' [my apostrophes].", making it a classic front for traditional fascism and other American-style old-fashioned family values. in-q-tel.org A look at the names involved in In-Q-Tel quickly reveals it as a front for Zionism Central. cia.gov So, we should all be most grateful to 'Popular Mechanics' and its new editor James Meigs for indirectly telling us who the real perpetrators of 9/11 were by its rather long-winded "blind 'em with science" attempt to suppress the truth of behalf of those perpetrators. << PS. On principle, Ray will object to the rense.com source but as far as I am concerned the article seems reasonable enough.

To: twmoore who wrote (9828)	2/11/2005 2:42:23 PM
From: LPS5	Respond to of 20039

Someone should try to chase down who is behind this article. So the magazine "Popular Mechanics" is now part of this ever-widening conspiracy theory? e