SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: redfish who wrote (301784)2/10/2005 9:26:12 AM
From: MythMan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Homeland Security would catch em -g-



To: redfish who wrote (301784)2/10/2005 9:49:51 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
They could do that, if they were into giving up their only protection against an belligerent super power to a bunch of unstable nutburgers. <G> But with just two bombs, they'd have to choose their targets well. I would recommend Crawford, Texas and Kennebuncport, Maine. <VBG>



To: redfish who wrote (301784)2/10/2005 10:34:16 AM
From: SiouxPal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
I thiMk each countrys' nuclear weapons have their own "signature", the percentage of each of the 3 isotopes involved. Lil' Kim's pecker ain't that big IMO.
Meanwhile his people are starving to death.
Bush just pisses off every country he deals with.

Sioux-no-nuklar-siantist


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News