SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zonder who wrote (218561)2/10/2005 2:29:28 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1574767
 
I think we should impose santions on them [Saudi Arabia]

What do you expect to use in place of oil if you impose sanctions on SA, pray tell?

Because, you know, even if SA does not spur the rest of OPEC into retaliatory action against US, price of oil will go over $100 in a heartbeat in the very unlikely event of US imposing sanctions on SA oil.


Very true. I think we are between a rock and a hard place when it comes to SA.

ted



To: zonder who wrote (218561)2/10/2005 8:11:52 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574767
 
I agree. However, if we spend some time and energy reducing our consumption and building new technologies to replace oil and gas in our cars, then maybe Saudi oil wouldn't be such a heroin addiction for us.

I'm a realist when it comes to sanctions on our only allies in the Middle East. I've said this before and I'll say it again, we need to go after the hardcases like Iran first and then we can go after the Saudi Arabia's. And with Pakistan and Saudi, we won't have to invade. Instead, we can just exert a hell of a lot of diplomatic pressure, because they are already our partners to some degree.