Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (671900)	2/10/2005 2:00:18 PM
From: Wayners	Respond to of 769670

Thats a different topic entirely, and those are paltry dividends as well.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (671900)	2/10/2005 2:42:31 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

If you're nostalgic for the 1990s, check out the article in today's New York Times about the indictment of a fund-raiser for Sen. Hillary Clinton: In August 2000, Bill and Hillary Clinton attended a Hollywood fund-raiser billed as a tribute to a president ready to leave the White House after eight years and a first lady seeking to establish herself as a force of her own in American politics. The guest list reflected the glitter of the occasion: Cher, Diana Ross, Brad Pitt and Patti LaBelle, to name just a few. But a person who later emerged as perhaps the most memorable--to the Clintons and their associates, anyway--was a well-connected figure with a checkered past who helped organize the event. He is Peter Paul, a man who pleaded guilty to cocaine possession and trying to defraud Fidel Castro's government out of millions of dollars in 1979, among other things. Mr. Paul said he spent nearly $2 million of his own on the fund-raiser as a way to curry favor with Mr. Clinton, and photographs show him chatting with Mr. Clinton at a dinner table, having a discussion with Mrs. Clinton and striking poses for the camera with both of them. Associates of the Clintons say the couple did not know of Mr. Paul's troubled past at the time, and in the months after the event, Mr. Paul turned on the Clintons, later urging investigators to look into the fund-raiser. Clinton lawyer David Kendall makes an appearance in the article, as does gadfly legal group Judicial Watch. Ah, it takes us back. Still, anyone who tries to defraud Castro can't be all bad. Also amusing is the "Times News Tracker" box on the right side of the Web page, which offers the following topics: "Clinton, Bill," "Clinton, Hillary Rodham" and "Frauds and Swindling."

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (671900)	2/10/2005 3:41:47 PM
From: Hope Praytochange	Respond to of 769670

charts.dacharts.com

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (671900)	2/10/2005 3:57:39 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 769670

CNN should rid itself of Eason Jordan (Joe Scarborough) There is a cancer growing at CNN, and it's time it got cut out. It's time for the real deal. Last night I told you about the noteworthy news coverage of Christiane Amanpour and Anderson Cooper while reporting on the Iraqi elections last month. Some around here may consider CNN a competitor, but I believe all news outlets should be teammates in pursuit of the truth. That's why I praise media outlets when events warrant, or tell you how they betray consumer's interests when their bias becomes apparent. We learned this week that one of CNN's most powerful news executives told a group of world leaders overseas that American soldiers had targeted reporters for assassination. That's right. One of the top news executives in America spent his time before some of the most influential people on the planet telling them that American men and women deliberately targeted journalists for assassination. Democratic Congressman Barney Frank told Michelle Malkin that after Jordan made the statements, he was so troubled that he tried to get specific examples from Jordan. But Jordan refused to provide an ounce of proof to support his outrageous charge. Connecticut Senator Christopher Dodd, a Democratic leader in the upper chamber, confirmed Jordan made the outrageous comments. CNN supporters suggested that Jordan deserved the benefit of the doubt. But this is after all, the same Eason Jordan who admitted in 2003 that he turned a blind eye to Saddam Hussein's tyranny and torture so CNN could have access to the Stalinist leader's government and keep CNN's Baghdad bureau open. There's more: Jordan also told an audience in 2004 that American troops had arrested and tortured journalists in Iraq. But last year's charges, like those leveled this year, were not backed up by a single fact by Mr. Jordan. But one fact is not in dispute: this CNN leader has defamed the honor and integrity of our brave men and women in uniform by reckless charges presented in the most cowardly way: behind closed doors in conferences packed by international elites. If Jordan thinks U.S. troops are little more than hired assassins focused on killing journalists, it is time for him to name names. Otherwise his continued attacks constitute slander. I know troops in harms way in Iraq. I have heard their inspiring stories when cameras were turned off and their babies were sleeping in their laps. They believe are exporting liberty — not assassination squads. Ironically, it is CNN's Eason Jordan who is the assassin. Blowing away the reputations of 150,000 troops who do not know whether they will see another sunrise tomorrow. They deserve better from the press, and CNN deserves better than to have to put up with the likes of Eason Jordan. CNN's President Jonathan Klein has gotten off to an inspiring start these past few months. He should not allow Jordan to stain his reputation, stain his network's reputation, or stain the proud professional reporters who make CNN their home. Eason Jordan should be fired. msnbc.msn.com