Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: T L Comiskey who wrote (7189)	2/11/2005 3:43:10 PM
From: techguerrilla	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 362315

swish, again ... eom

To: T L Comiskey who wrote (7189)	2/11/2005 3:53:59 PM
From: Skywatcher	Respond to of 362315

House Passes Driver's License Ban for Illegal Immigrants By Mary Curtius Times Staff Writer Thursday 10 February 2005 WASHINGTON -- Signaling a potentially bruising congressional battle on immigration reform, the House on Thursday passed a bill that would virtually bar states from issuing driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, tighten the rules for asylum and close a hole in the border fence between California and Mexico. The bill passed 261-161. But the prospects for its provisions becoming law remain uncertain. Indeed, the House vote underscored the divide between it and the Senate on immigration policy. Many House Republicans are determined to crack down on illegal immigrants and raise the bar for proving a credible case for asylum. But the GOP-controlled Senate is laying the groundwork for taking up President Bush's proposal for creating a "guest worker" program that could legalize the status of millions of illegal workers. Immigration policy "is the issue that will boil up and spill over and split (Republicans in Congress), if the administration continues to want to drive down this direction," said Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, a member of the House Immigration Reform Caucus. This increasingly vocal group, composed mostly of Republicans, advocates cracking down on illegal immigrants and limiting legal immigration. They have arrayed themselves against the White House and those Republicans and Democrats who advocate a guest worker program or more far-reaching reforms that would create a path for citizenship for at least some of the estimated 8 million immigrants believed to be living in this country illegally. During debate on the bill the House passed Thursday, Republicans insisted it was a law enforcement and border security package aimed at keeping terrorists out of the United States. The drivers license provision, they argued, would hinder the ability of terrorists to travel freely here if they manage to slip over the borders. Democrats insisted that the measure, titled the Real ID Act by its sponsor, Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., R-Wis., was a harsh piece of anti-immigrant legislation. The bill would require states to verify that any driver's license applicant is residing legally in the United States before issuing a license that could be used for purposes of federal identification. That would mean states could issue licenses to illegal immigrants -- as 11states now do -- but those licenses could not be used to board airplanes in the United States, open bank accounts or enter federal buildings. A handful of Republicans and Democrats on Thursday said the standards would be the first step toward a national identification system. "If you vote for (the bill), you will be voting for a national ID card," said Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas. The license provision, he said, was not really voluntary, because "if a state opts out, nobody is going to accept their driver's licenses." The provisions targeted for the most criticism from Democrats were those that would increase the burden of proof that applicants for asylum must meet and would restrict the right of judges to review decisions by immigration officials at the borders to reject asylum applications. "The asylum provisions make it much more difficult for legitimate victims to be granted asylum," said Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., who offered an unsuccessful amendment to strip the provisions. As a result, Nadler warned, legitimate applicants fleeing persecution in their countries "will be sent back to their persecutors." Republicans insisted that the tougher asylum requirements are necessary to keep terrorists from gaming the system and some judges from loosely interpreting the laws to overrule immigration officials. Sensenbrenner said it would "bring back sanity" to the asylum system. Sensenbrenner noted that the bill would lift the cap on the number of successful asylum applicants who can apply for legal residency each year. That number is currently 10,000, and immigration advocates have long lobbied for it to be lifted. That is hardly an "anti-immigrant" move, Sensenbrenner said. But the bill also would make it possible to deport foreign residents if they are found to have contributed to terrorist groups or to have provided other support to such groups in the past. The bill's supporters said that would make such residents deportable for offenses that would have kept them out of the United States if known before they arrived. The American Civil Liberties Union, which opposed the bill, said it would deny foreign residents the protection of the U.S. Constitution. Even some of the bill's backers acknowledge there is a good chance it will not be considered by the Senate. As a result, Sensenbrenner extracted a promise from the GOP House leadership to attach it to one of the first pieces of legislation thought certain to be passed by both chambers this year. That is expected to be the bill the White House plans to send to Congress next week, seeking another $80 billion in funding for U.S. military and rebuilding operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. But the Democratic and Republican Senate leaders have said that adding the immigration provisions to the Iraq funding bill would only bog down the Senate's consideration of the measure, which the White House wants passed quickly. In Thursday's vote, 42 Democrats joined with 219 Republicans in passing Sensenbrenner's bill.