Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (218877)	2/12/2005 8:25:50 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574483

re: Only true if we separate Social Security from the general budget. We've done that on this thread. It's just not reflected in the official "Unified Budget". re: Besides, if the Dems supported such a move, they would be doing themselves a huge favor. Think about it. Why won't they? Reason #1, they are not in power. But the real reason is that they are just as complicit as the Republicans in the sham that is the fed budget. What do you think of the Bush admin separating most of the costs of the Iraq occupation out of the General Budget, and into special appropriations? Or the lies about the cost of the prescription drug benefit? It's government accounting by Enron standards. John