SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (28996)2/12/2005 1:10:10 AM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 90947
 
I don't see you chiding the Chinu's, redfishes,
Grainne's, Mephisto's & SiouxPal's on SI. Not once, not ever.

Excellent point. After I see him pound them a while, I might consider that I owe him an apology.

I won't hold my breath, though. I think he is neither man enough nor clear enough on the concept to do it.



To: Sully- who wrote (28996)2/12/2005 4:52:32 AM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
Did someone declare this to be clean the clock day? Why was I not notified?



To: Sully- who wrote (28996)2/12/2005 11:50:58 AM
From: Orcastraiter  Read Replies (11) | Respond to of 90947
 
Since we're still on the topic of free speech...I'll reply.

First, Laz said he was against banning...but then he bans. That's hypocrisy.

As for others who ban here on SI, be they liberal or conservative, they too are guilty of being anti free speech. At least they do not say they are against banning...and then ban. They ban with the full acceptance that they are limiting the conversation. Laz on the other hand says banning is bad...but then bans anyway.

I disagree with banning, whether it is done by conservatives or liberals. I usually don't say anything about it because they make no pretense about being anti ban. Laz on the other hand has gone on ad nauseum about being against banning. So when I participate on this thread I expect not to be banned.

As for personal attacks...you've got to be kidding. If that is the standard, then Laz would have to ban the whole lot of you...including himself. It's ok to call me whale blubber...but if I make a reference to Laz's fat ass...I'm banned? Doesn't anyone have a sense of humor? Either Laz does have a fat ass or it's covered with very thin skin.

Orca



To: Sully- who wrote (28996)2/12/2005 5:29:33 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
Whaleboy is just another dishonest demolib....