Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (672056)	2/12/2005 10:55:17 AM
From: sandintoes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

That poll is giving the American people far to much credit for knowing what is going on anywhere in the world, besides Hollywood. The average young person today doesn't know who their own Congressman is...

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (672056)	2/12/2005 12:26:41 PM
From: 10K a day	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Justify our involvement in iraq? maybe just start handing out swastikas. if you make the argument that bush family is inderectly responsible for the death of 500,000 babies i guess u know why we're there... My X wife used to say to me every day. 'what goes around comes around' ....i believe that. i don't know exactly how it happens. but we create our unresolved karma .... I don't think John Ascroft could handle the truth and i can't say i blame him. Bush is in this Sh*t so far over his head. He can't turn back. Or so he thinks. I do'nt think he's a reasoning rational man. but he may become one in the years ahead. Right now he's an obsessed raving lunatic. oh well. have fun. the thing about churchill. in the context in which he speaks. he makes a lot of sense. i never seen him speak in person. but i hear he's a powerful speaker. that's good reason to worry and i can understand why people going out of their way to attack his (churchills) credibility. like bush has credibiity. give me a break. lol when people are that concerned about attacking someones' credibility. i would examine a little closer 'WHO' is doing the attacking and why the attacker is afraid.