Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (219008)	2/12/2005 7:17:55 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574849

>Yep, the result of Bush's "compassionate conservatism." Guys like you will take the benefit and show absolutely no gratitude for "Bush's baby." All because it wasn't a Democrat who was in office. Huh? No. I would've liked it a lot more had it not been written by the drug companies. -Z

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (219008)	2/12/2005 9:21:34 PM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 1574849

re: I never agreed to the prescription drug benefit in the first place. You supported profligate Bush, right? re: Seems like your only beef is its implementation, not the concept of it. Are you not reading my posts? DEFICIT SPENDING MAY PUT YOU IN THE POOR HOUSE, IDIOT! We are on the cusp of a disaster, and all you care about is the fucking Dem/Rep bull shit. Pay attention, the country is being led to down the drain. Bush could be the premier Dem/Liberal and I would say the same thing. I'm more conservative than Bush by 10X. Look at the actions, not the rhetoric. Or are you too damn stupid? I believe you are. John