Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (100114)	2/13/2005 8:13:04 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793707

Your continuing to defame our combat troops may seem like sport to you. It isn't to me. On their behalf, I'd like to tell you and CNN to FXXX OFF. You reliably make my arguments for me. Did I defame our combat troops? Where did I do that? By saying that it's theoretically possible that some soldier somewhere has shot at a some reporter? What makes you think that "utterly impossible"? And of even more interest to me, why do you read defamation of our troops into my humble observation? And why do you attack me for it rather than offering some proof or counter-rationale? If you have any proof, post it. I thought I had. I'm not claiming that anything happened, only that it's not "utterly impossible." In the absence of proof (or even a rationale, it seems) that it's impossible, anything's possible. That's a basic logical proof. If you have any proof (either fact or logic) that it's "utterly impossible," you post it.