SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)2/13/2005 12:49:55 AM
From: SiouxPal  Respond to of 362185
 
I am with you Jim Willie... all the way. We all are I hope

Sioux



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)2/14/2005 9:20:39 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362185
 
This Is What Tax Cuts and Stupid Wars Cost

forum.truthout.org



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)2/14/2005 12:46:14 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362185
 
HOWARD DEAN HEADING DNC... RIGHT CHOICE?

bernardmoon.blogspot.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)2/14/2005 9:57:21 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362185
 
Bush & the Rise of 'Managed-Democracy'

commondreams.org



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)2/19/2005 7:35:16 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 362185
 
Gresham's Law Returns
Alec Nevalainen

The concept of "bad money driving out the good" was recognized long before Thomas Gresham, but his name is lent to the theory because he persuaded Queen Elizabeth I to restore an already debased currency in 1558.

Simply put, Gresham's Law is the theory holding that if two kinds of money in circulation have the same denominational value but different intrinsic values, the money with higher intrinsic value will be hoarded (for a complete description, see here).

Of course, the action of "hoarding" must first take place, but the United States is close to an environment today where this may return.

For example, copper settled at $1.5126/lb on Friday, February 18. Using the calculations below, the pre-1982 cent that weighs 3.11 grams and a metal composition of 97.5% copper/2.5% zinc has a metal value of $0.01022 (roughly 102.18% its denomination value).

(.975 * 3.11 * 1.5126 * .0022046) + (.025 * 3.11 * .6186 * .0022046) = 0.01022

From personal experience, an average roll of circulated cents from any bank will usually include around 12 to 15 pre-1982 cents (around 25%). Obviously this varies, but I wouldn't consider this a coin that is broadly hoarded...yet.

Keep in mind; the U.S. Mint fabricated two compositions in 1982, the predominately copper version that weighs 3.11 grams and the predominately zinc version that weighs 2.5 grams. The zinc version currently produced isn't quite there yet, but its intrinsic value is beginning to rise with zinc prices hitting new highs. Using Friday's settlement price of $0.6186/lb, the post-1982 cent is worth $0.00353 (roughly 35.33% of its denomination). Zinc prices have a way to go.

The only other interesting trend is nickel. The five-cent piece is composed of 25% nickel/75% copper, with a total weight of 5.00 grams. Using Friday's settlement price of $7.0686/lb for nickel, and copper's $1.5126/lb price, we get the following:

(0.75 * 5 * 1.5126 * .0022046) + (0.25 * 5 * 7.0686 * .0022046) = .03198

A nickel has a current intrinsic value of $0.03198 (roughly 63.97% of its denomination). Nickel and copper prices would need to rise almost 70% before we begin to see a higher intrinsic value than denomination. A long way to go, but certainly plausible.

I guess the big question is, should you go out and trade your paper dollars for common circulating coins (specifically nickels and pennies)? I don't think it's a crazy thing to do in moderation. I wouldn't walk into your bank with a wheel barrel, demanding $10,000 in coinage. I think you should save what you already have though.

Another point to remember is what happened during World War II. The composition of two coins was changed during the war, the nickel and the copper cent. Silver (a once plentiful metal) replaced nickel, and steel replaced copper. If you're convinced more war is in the future, converting that $10,000 lying around might not be a bad idea.

For a complete chart of intrinsic coin values, visit coinflation.com.

Alec Nevalainen


coinflation.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)3/2/2005 11:51:59 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 362185
 
WE'RE FLU'D

____________________________

WWW.NYPRESS.COM | MARCH 2, 2005

THE NEWS HOLE

"The world is now in the gravest possible danger of a pandemic," the World Health Organization's Shigeru Omi said last week, prophesizing a pestilence that may make the Black Plague look like a recreational club drug. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the super-flu, which may just solve New York City's pesky overcrowding problem.

In a healthy virus cycle, pandemics (diseases that affect at least 25 percent of the world's population) occur every 20 or 30 years. They wreak havoc, then burn out and disappear. Kind of like forest fires. Only there hasn't been a flu pandemic since 1968. That means a lot of kindling is waiting for a spark.

The super-bug comes from China, the great pandemic breeding ground. On Chinese farms, ducks and pigs (virus carriers) live together directly beneath people. If the virus reassorts and infects farm workers, it's a short leap to the general population. The super-flu first popped up in 1997 in Hong Kong poultry, killing chickens quicker than workers could slit their throats and turn them into two-piece meals. The virus was known as avian flu H5N1 or "chicken Ebola"—infected chickens died within 48 hours due to massive, bloody hemorrhaging. Nearly 100 percent of stricken fowl died. Worse, the virus jumped the species barrier, infecting 18 humans, of whom six died.

"Bird viruses live in the guts of birds. They should not infect people," says flu specialist Dr. Jack Bernstein, my father, and chief of infectious diseases at the Veteran Affairs Medical Center of Dayton, Ohio. There are three major flu strains, Bernstein says, which vary to certain degrees. For the most part, we've been exposed to these strains and have developed some antibodies. Avian flu, however, serves as an antigenic shift—a departure from any known strain.

"And humans don't have a smidgen of immunity for avian flu."

In response to the threat, China and its Asian neighbors culled and incinerated millions of ducks and fowl. H5N1 disappeared. Until 2003, that is. In December of that year, H5N1 popped up in Korea. Then Vietnam. Then Thailand. As of last week, 46 people have succumbed to avian flu, at a mortality rate (so far) in excess of 70 percent.

Flu is an inefficient murderer, preying on the elderly and infirm. Death (occurring in 0.1 percent of cases) is caused by a lethal pneumonia, which plays sloppy seconds to the initial infection. But the 1918 to 1919 Spanish flu was a nasty sumbitch, killing patients at about a 2.5 percent clip: The virus, like the avian flu, caused uncontrollable hemorrhaging. Patients literally drowned on their frothy blood.

More disturbing, Spanish flu flipped infection patterns: Instead of selecting gramps, the influenza had a taste for healthy adults. Ninety-nine percent of the people who succumbed were younger than 65. When the flu finished its rampage, nearly a fifth of the world's population had been infected. Upward of 40 million people died, including about 675,000 Americans. By contrast, only around 8 million people died in World War I.

Such mortality tallies may soon seem trivial. If H5N1's pathogenic potential (i.e., how well it kills) proves to be half as effective as that of the Spanish flu and the virus mutates to efficiently spread between humans (there's already been one case: an 11-year-old Thai girl infected her mother, killing them both) we could enter an epidemiological apocalypse. World Health Organization officials predict, in an optimistic scenario, two to seven million people worldwide would die. The toll could reach 100 million.

In other words, bye-bye Big Apple.

According to Bernstein, within days of the first super-flu case hitting New York City, hospitals would be overwhelmed. Tent cities could form in the streets. Then, if the doctors and police officers started dying, anarchy, martial law and looting would ensue. "It'll be just like the good old days," he says.

"To stop the virus from spreading, you'd have to lock down the city in a 28 Days Later–like dramatic quarantine," according to Bernstein. The flu would eventually burn out, he says, but how many people would perish first?

"Influenza has been known to wipe out entire islands," he notes.

If the scenario sounds pretty bleak, it is. We're stuck in a waiting game, not knowing when the flu might hit, if it can infect humans or its murderous capability. It could be as harmless as a minor cold. Or it could be a cataclysmic population cleansing. If that's the case, then expect to suffocate on your blood while ducks and fowl quack and cluck their sweet revenge: payback for eons of breakfast, lunch and dinner.

—Joshua M. Bernstein

Volume 18, Issue 9

nypress.com
© 2005 New York Press



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)3/6/2005 10:38:07 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362185
 
seattlepi.nwsource.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)3/6/2005 11:49:43 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 362185
 
Ohio State shocks No. 1 Illinois

usatoday.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)3/7/2005 2:15:10 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362185
 
As jobs are outsourced, honest debate is needed

siliconvalley.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)3/8/2005 1:45:47 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 362185
 
Housing mania will end in tears

tinyurl.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)3/10/2005 12:07:28 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362185
 
Thoughts on a Second Great Depression
Posted by: manystrom on Monday, March 07, 2005 - 07:37 AM
M.A. Nystrom, M.B.A.
Man on the street in (the Republic of) China
March 7, 2005

1. Introduction to the Second Great Depression

The idea of a second great depression first occurred to me in the summer of 1998, at an empty bookstore in a shiny, modern, deserted mall in Bangkok. It was a year after the Asian financial crisis had devastated the economies of many newly emerging Asian nations, casting a pall over the fantasy of uninterrupted economic growth. Bangkok still bustled, but the city was dotted with brand new malls such as this one, immaculate temples to capitalism, everything 50% off but with no buyers in sight. Some of the older malls were already abandoned, escalators stopped and gathering trash, their upper floors darkened while the lower floors became home to spontaneous traditional markets selling vegetables and household goods from makeshift stalls.

It was in this context that I first picked up Robert Prechter's book "At the Crest of the Tidal Wave," in that deserted bookstore. I devoured the book and all of its charts over the next few days and began to see Bangkok in a different context. It was a glimpse of the future of America: Deserted malls, innumerable cardboard and tin shanties built along the railroad tracks by people without homes of their own, and others -- the sick, the injured, the lame, the living dead -- sleeping in the shadows of gleaming new skyscrapers, the monuments to modern finance capitalism.

This began a long journey into understanding the nature and causes of economic depressions that has turned into something of a scavenger hunt for me, one clue leading to the next in an ever-expanding search for truth.

2. Cycles, Cycles, Cycles

The idea of cycles of prosperity and suffering is nothing new. The Bible tells the story of Pharoah's dream, which Joseph interpreted as a prediction of seven years of feast, followed by seven years of even greater famine. (The Bible is full of symbols, and seven is not a literal number, but the number of God, symbolizing a divinely ordained period of time.)

Modern man is far removed from his natural roots, and is no longer ruled by mysticism or religion, but it is still possible to see that everything in nature moves in cycles. The earth spins round once a day, and travels around the sun once a year. Because of this we have seasons that determine when many plants and animals are born and grow, and when they die. Other cycles govern the growth and decline of markets, societies and civilizations.

2.1 Elliott Waves

My search for the second great depression began with Prechter and his theory of Elliott Waves, which are clearly identifiable patterns that describe how groups of people behave. They reveal that mass psychology swings from pessimism to optimism and back in a natural sequence. The waves are most clearly seen and measured in financial markets. The patterns are fractals, occurring at all levels of scale, from minutes all the way to years, decades and centuries, rising and falling according to natural rules. From Prechter's analysis, we are just completing a pattern of Grand Supercycle degree, which in short means that after decades of prosperity, we are on the brink of an economic setback that will be larger than the Great Depression (which was a pullback of only Supercycle degree).

Prechter's first forecast for the great market top came in 1995, then again in 2000. Markets did peak in 2000, but the onset of the ensuing depression has been like waiting for a slow train coming.

2.2 Technology Long Waves

From an economic standpoint, Soviet economist Kondratieff identified a long wave cycle in capitalist economies of about 60 years that got him banished to Siberia for claiming that capitalism was cyclical, moving through periods of growth, booms and busts but inevitable regeneration. Further study on long waves by Western researchers identified that the process behind long waves is an interaction between 1) new technology, 2) business opportunities that the new technology creates, and 3) an eventual overbuilding of capital after the technology ages. The stages are:
1. Discoveries in science create a phenomenal base for technological innovation
2. Radical and basic technological innovations create new products
3. These products create new markets and new industries
4. The new industries continue product and process innovation, expanding markets
5. As technology matures, new competitors enter, creating excess capacity
6. Excess capacity decreases profitability and increases business failures and unemployment
7. Subsequent economic turmoil in financial markets leads to depressions
8. New science and new technology provides the basis for new economic expansions. (From Managing Technology, by Frederick Betz, National Science Foundation, 1987)
Up to #6, this sounds very much like the internet boom and bust of the 1990's, but as of yet, it has not led to a second great depression.

2.3 Concentration of Wealth

Ravi Batra's book "The Great Depression of 1990" has excellent discussions on a number of different cycles that lead to depressions, including social cycles, cycles of monetary growth, government regulation, as well as concentration of wealth. The book is well worth the read, in spite of its title (and very cheap at used book stores because of it). Batra points out that there is a large body of economic literature upholding the theory that recessions are caused by unequal distribution of incomes and concentration of wealth.

It works like this: As savings rise, consumption falls. Since the rich save more money than the poor, the concentration of wealth in fewer hands increases savings and decreases consumption. As demand drops, and economic growth fails to keep pace with growth in the labor force, unemployment rises. Classically, this is a self-correcting process; labor costs eventually adjust, excesses are flushed out of the system, and growth begins anew. But in a depression, the above process is accompanied by a collapse of the financial system. A recession is a normal, necessary part of the business cycle and will not, in itself, cause a healthy financial system to collapse. However, as wealth becomes concentrated, it has a detrimental effect on the financial system. As Batra goes on to explain, in a sound financial system, banks make loans only to credit-worthy customers who are unlikely to default on their loans. But when wealth becomes concentrated, the number of less affluent people increases, as well as their borrowing needs. These less affluent people, who now make up the majority, have fewer assets and are thus less credit worthy. Even in such an environment, banks cannot afford to be choosy -- they must make loans in order to stay "competitive" with their peers and simply to stay in business. Thus, as the concentration of wealth rises, the number of unhealthy banks with shaky loans also rises in a dangerous spiral, increasing the possibility of systemic failure.

A perverse side effect of the growing wealth disparity is the rise in speculative investments. As a person becomes wealthy, his aversion to risk declines, so the number of risky investments by the rich also increases. Money doesn't mean so much to the rich, so they're willing to take a wild chance on a flyer, if it will double, triple or quadruple their money. As Charles Kindleberger puts it:
The object of speculation may vary from one mania or bubble to the next. It may involve primary products, or goods manufactured for export to distant markets, domestic and foreign securities of various kinds, contracts to buy or sell goods or securities, land in the city or country, houses, office buildings, shopping centers, condominiums, foreign exchange. At a late stage, speculation tends to detach itself from really valuable objects and turn to delusive ones. A larger and larger group of people seeks to become rich without a real understanding of the process involved. Not surprisingly, swindlers and catchpenny schemes flourish.
Sound familiar? We've seen bubbles in each of the securities he mentioned over the last two decades, and the last few years have shown us that even huge, multinational companies such as Enron and WorldCon can also be swindlers and catchpenny artists. Everyone wants to be rich quick and with the minimal amount of effort. In spite of these signs of the times, it has yet to lead to a second great depression.

4. Not if, When

There are so many factors pointing to a breakdown of the current dollar-based financial system that I have simply lost count. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer and the divide between them grows wider each day. The US government is in more debt than it can every repay. Personal bankruptcies are at an all time high. Home "ownership" is also at an all time high, but much of it is due to risky loans made by audacious banks to unqualified buyers. It is the banks that own the homes, not the people. In fact, banks own just about everything, since most everything these days is purchased on credit. Personal debt is at an all time high. Americans work longer and harder, but wages have stagnated. The number of Americans who are homeless and in jail is at an all time high. These problems are not going away, and they're not getting better. People are falling out of the system at an increasing rate, and it is only a matter of time before that trickle becomes a deluge.

My point is not to convince you of the inevitability of a financial collapse. One need only look at history to understand that the tide of prosperity rises and falls with time. In my mind a second great depression is a foregone conclusion, a fait accompli. The storm clouds are gathering and growing darker. We have already felt the first drops of rain. It is not a matter of if, but when.

But depressions do not affect everyone equally. Even during the Great Depression, which left 25% of workers unemployed, it also left 75% with jobs. The amount of work did not fall -- there is always work to be done and needs to fulfill -- but there was no money to pay the workers. Times of change also produce great opportunities for enterprising individuals. For example, the wildly popular board game Monopoly was born during the depths of the Great Depression, allowing people to fantasize about better times and also learn the skills of capitalism.

Studying the causes and effects of past collapses can help you become psychologically prepared, mitigate personal damage, preserve wealth, and then you can begin taking steps toward building a better, more just and robust system for the future. In the coming environment, will you be one of the 75% with a job, or the 25% or more without? Will you be an entrepreneur, on the lookout for new opportunities for betterment, or will you be waiting for a government handout and a government solution? Will you be caught at the top, holding speculative investments that will eventually become worthless, or will you be picking up bargains at the bottom of the cycle? Will you blame the system or look for ways to help create a better system?

5. Purpose of a Second Great Depression

Since first picking up Prechter's book, my reading over the past several years has covered a wide range of topics beyond just financial markets, and I've come to see that the looming depression is actually a symptom of deeper problems, not a root cause. Unbridled capitalism under a fiat currency system leads to ever greater consumption feuled by debt spending. But if every country (notably the emerging BRIC countries) wants to achieve the American way of life, humanity will suck the earth dry of her resources and pollute the environment with the refuse of our disposable lives. It is already happening, and this also plays a role in the coming depression.

Just as the Great Depression came as the final break in the transformation of the US from an agricultural to an industrial economy, the second great depression can bee seen as the line of demarcation between the industrial age and the age of a knowledge based economy. From this perspective, the looming depression should be seen as an opportunity, not a disaster. Humanity must transform and change its course of development away from the path of inevitable destruction through consumption, and seek new ways of living and interacting with each other and its environment. The American economy doesn't manufacture as much as it used to (that seems to be China's job now), but American ideas still power the world, from the automobile to computers to the internet. The world still looks to America for the most innovative ideas. To make our way out of the depression, we're going to have to think our way out. (This is why I encourage you to turn off the TV and think!)

Our current monetary system is a relic of the past that is not equipped to handle current or future needs for humanity. The old saying that money makes the world go around is quite true: Without money, we would never do lots of things that now keep many of us occupied for our entire lives! At its root, our monetary system is flawed, causing us to make fatal choices. Part of the reason for this is that The Federal Reserve has been given the power to create money from nothing. Another part of the reason is the role that interest plays in systematically transferring wealth from the poor to the rich.

The wealthiest people and organizations own most of the interest bearing assets. They receive an uninterrupted flow of interest from whoever needs to borrow money. This chart shows the impact of the transfer of wealth via interest from one social group to another, based on a study performed in Germany in 1982. Germans were grouped into ten income categories of equal size, and during that year, a total of 270 billion DM in interest was paid and received. The graph clearly shows the systemic transfer of wealth from the bottom 80% of the population to the top. This transfer of wealth is due exclusively to the monetary system, and is completely independent of the degree of cleverness or industriousness of the participants -- the classic argument to justify large differences in income. As a result of schemes such as these, the top 1% of Americans now have more personal wealth than the bottom 92% combined! (From The Future of Money, by Bernard Lietaer, Random House UK 2001) In these modern times, money has lost all connection with value, work and productivity, making a collapse of the system inevitable. Part of the purpose of a second great depression will be to flush away arbitrary, unfair systems such as these.

Under a sound monetary system, the value of a currency is tied to a fixed asset such as gold, so banks and governments can't create money out of thin air, as they do today. This will help to limit the power of government. Other types of fairer monetary systems exist and these can also be created, and I will discuss these in the future. (Please sign up for updates if you'd like to stay informed) These systems will be instrumental in the rebuilding process after the depression, since fiat currencies will be seen for what they truly are -- worthless paper.

6. Conclusion

Like a slow train coming, another great depression is on its way. No one knows exactly when that train will arrive, so now is the time to prepare for your safety and do what you can to preserve the wealth you've built. Then you can begin to scan the horizon for opportunities that will inevitably arise, and think about ways you can help people less fortunate than yourself.

Pessimism, cynicism and negativity are for better times; for times like the ones we are approaching, we can't afford them.

I believe the looming second great depression with be a cathartic period of transformation giving us (meaning all of us, collectively) the opportunity to reengineer society into something more just, free and appropriate for the future world that we are living into. Just as we no longer need to spend 16 hours per day slaving on the farm to meet our subsistence needs, in the future we won't need to spend 10 hours per day slaving at the office in order to simply consume more.

The digital information communications revolution is changing the world as much as the industrial revolution did, but in the midst of the current dislocations and confusion, it is difficult to recognize. But since most work -- from farming to manufacturing to many routine services -- can be automated, the question then becomes what will people do with their time? How will people live and interact? The answers to these questions will be decided during the pain, confusion, reflection and search for answers that the second great depression will inevitably bring.

bullnotbull.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)3/11/2005 12:54:46 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362185
 
Crude Oil Falls as U.S. Supplies Rise

March 10 (Bloomberg) -- Crude oil in New York fell for the first time in seven sessions amid strengthening U.S. inventories and lower shipments to China, the second-biggest fuel consumer.

Higher supplies depressed prices after futures rose within 2 cents of the record of $55.67 a barrel yesterday. U.S. stockpiles last week were 9.7 percent higher than a year ago, the Energy Department reported yesterday. China's oil imports fell 13 percent in the January-February period to 18.2 million metric tons, the Customs General Administration said today.

``We tried and failed to hit the record yesterday and are still down today, which is a bearish signal,'' said Bill O'Grady, director of fundamental futures research with A.G. Edwards & Sons Inc. in St. Louis. ``It's scary to say this but this may be the beginning of a correction. We've risen awfully high in the face of rising inventories.''

Crude oil for April delivery fell $1.57 cents, or 2.9 percent, to $53.20 a barrel at 2:09 p.m. on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Futures touched $55.65 a barrel yesterday, matching the intraday high reached on Oct. 27. Prices are up 47 percent from a year ago.

``The Chinese imported too much oil in the fourth quarter and are working their way through their stockpiles,'' said Rick Mueller, an analyst with Energy Security Analysis Inc. in Wakefield, Massachusetts. ``China's refinery runs are still very high so demand isn't being hit.''

Oil surged 34 percent in New York last year because production wasn't keeping up with global demand, particularly from China. Global use will rise an estimated 2.5 percent to an average 84.7 million barrels a day this year, an Energy Department report on March 8 showed. World oil production will average 84.6 million barrels a day, the report said.

`Prices Are Too High'

``Oil prices are too high,'' U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow said in an interview from Albuquerque, New Mexico. ``They act like a tax, they reduce disposable income and create headwinds. Fortunately our economy is so strong and so resilient we've been able to press through those headwinds all against the backdrop of moderate inflation.''

Prices rose in 1974 after an oil embargo that followed the Arab-Israeli war and from 1979 through 1981 after Iran cut oil exports. The average cost of oil used by U.S. refiners was $35.24 a barrel in 1981, according to the Energy Department, or $75.71 in today's dollars.

Market's Resilience

``The market has shown its resilience and after today should resume its move higher,'' said Justin Fohsz, a broker with Starsupply Petroleum Inc. in Englewood, New Jersey. ``Prices are about where they should be when you take inflation into account, which is why they have been accepted pretty well. I think we will see $60 oil before we see $40 oil again.''

In London, the April Brent crude-oil futures contract declined $1.13, or 2.1 percent, to $52.25 a barrel on the International Petroleum Exchange. Brent futures touched $54.30 a barrel yesterday, the highest since the contract was introduced in 1988.

The International Energy Agency, adviser to industrialized nations on energy policy, tomorrow publishes its monthly outlook for supply and demand. The Paris-based IEA has raised its oil demand forecasts in all but three months since November 2003, citing unexpectedly fast growth in Chinese consumption.

The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, producer of about 40 percent of the world's oil, meets in Isfahan, Iran, on March 16 to discuss production and prices. Ten OPEC members, excluding Iraq, have production quotas set by the group. Members that could pump more ignored those limits in the latter half of 2004, as prices rose to records.

OPEC Cut

OPEC agreed in December to cut production by 1 million barrels a day beginning on Jan. 1 to meet its quota of 27 million barrels a day to stop inventories from rising.

Gasoline for April delivery fell 5.59 cents, or 3.7 percent, to $1.477 a gallon in New York. Futures touched $1.56 a gallon yesterday, the highest since the contract began trading in 1984. Gasoline is 38 percent higher than a year ago.

``Last week gasoline led the rally but that prop is giving way,'' said James Ritterbusch, president of Ritterbusch and Associates, a Galena, Illinois-based oil researcher. ``The underlying items that have driven hedge-fund interest remain. OPEC's limiting of supply and a weak dollar make it likely that there will be another run at the record.''

Hedge-fund managers and other large speculators last week had their biggest bet on higher oil prices since June, according to a report by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission on March 4. Speculative long positions, or bets prices will rise, outnumbered short positions by 60,173 contracts on March 1 on the New York Mercantile Exchange, the commission reported.

To contact the reporter on this story:
Mark Shenk in New York at mshenk1@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Robert Dieterich at rdieterich@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: March 10, 2005 14:23 EST

tinyurl.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)12/7/2005 2:15:31 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362185
 
Gold's Enduring Mystery

By Robert J. Samuelson
The Washington Post
Wednesday, December 7, 2005
washingtonpost.com

The price of gold passed $500 an ounce last week, its highest level since the late 1980s. This is an ominous development -- or it isn't. You can make the case that higher gold prices (up 23 percent from 2004's average) warn of worsening inflation. Gold has long served as an inflation hedge, and when U.S. inflation reached double-digit levels in the late 1970s, gold hit a record high of about $850 in early 1980. But you can also argue that the present run-up has little to do with inflation and mostly reflects that old economic standby: the law of supply and demand.

It's precisely because gold has so much history that we still watch its price. In his illuminating book "The Power of Gold," Peter Bernstein notes that "Egyptians were casting gold bars as money as early as 4000 B.C." Later, in Europe, gold enabled kings to pay armies and bribe rivals. In 1511 Spain's King Ferdinand exhorted his conquistadors: "Get gold, humanely if possible, but at all hazards, get gold."

If you'd lived a century ago, gold would have been the basis of your money. Britain dominated the global gold standard; its currency, the pound, was freely convertible into gold. So were many other monies. In the United States, about $610 million of gold coin constituted nearly 30 percent of America's currency in 1900. All the rest -- paper notes and silver -- could be exchanged freely for gold, notes economist Michael Bordo of Rutgers University. But the gold standard's very rigidity led to its collapse in the Great Depression. Too little gold fostered banking and currency crises. On April 5, 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt ordered Americans to surrender their gold coins; the country effectively went on a paper-money standard.

Even stripped of its role as money, gold retains an economic mystique. About 85 percent of annual consumption goes for jewelry and, to a much lesser extent, other commercial uses, mainly electronics and dental work. But the recent price run-up seems driven by the remaining 15 percent: investors, speculators and hoarders. These include commodity funds, hedge funds and wealthy individuals. Especially in Asia and the Middle East, the rich hoard gold bars. In the first nine months of 2005, the investment and speculative demand for gold rose 62 percent, reports the World Gold Council, an industry group.

Except for the belief that gold will go higher, just what motivates these buyers isn't clear. Take your pick of anxiety, says analyst Philip Newman of GFMS, a consulting firm: inflation, financial crisis, terrorism, general global disorder. Because holding gold can be an alternative to holding dollars, rising American inflation and a falling dollar on foreign exchange markets are often cited as reasons for higher gold prices. But the dollar has recently strengthened on foreign exchange markets, and the evidence of increasing inflation is thin. True, oil temporarily made it worse. But excluding erratic food and energy prices, inflation has remained at about 2.5 percent since early 2004. Perhaps gold buyers glimpse dangers not apparent in the statistics.

Or maybe the real culprit is true scarcity. Copper is now selling for about $2 a pound, up from about 70 cents four years ago. At $60 a barrel, oil has doubled since late 2003. In each case, global demand -- influenced heavily by China and India -- has squeezed available supplies. Gold could be the same. After the 1980 peak, gold prices went on a two-decade slide that bottomed in 2001 at an average of $271. Low prices discouraged exploration and the opening of new mines. In 2004 global mine production dropped 5 percent, or 128 metric tons, the largest absolute decline in 71 years, according to Newmont Mining Corp., the world's biggest gold producer.

Meanwhile, growing wealth in India, China and the Middle East has revived jewelry demand; that's up 12 percent this year after a 5 percent increase in 2004. Jewelry is often more than adornment; it's also a store of wealth. Consider India. "For thousands of years, [gold jewelry] has been a means of savings," says George Milling-Stanley of the World Gold Council. "Seventy percent or more of consumption is among the rural population. They don't have access to banks, stocks or bonds. They don't trust government or paper currency."

Higher demand collides with constricted supplies; wham, prices rise. That stimulates more speculative demand, but it also enlarges supply by causing past investors in bars or jewelry to sell and take profits. Governments also have large gold stocks; their sales and purchases influence prices, too.

Though new mines often require a decade to bring into production, supply could ultimately overtake demand. Or prosperity in India and China might multiply by many times the world's gold bugs. They may regard gold as a more trustworthy form of saving than any currency, even though gold investments don't pay interest or dividends. Whatever happens, the fears and anxieties that give gold its speculative appeal could intensify or dissipate. Gold is an unending mystery, because its value lies less in what it does for us (unlike sugar, copper or oil) and more in what it symbolizes. It is almost as unfathomable as the human drama itself.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)12/8/2005 2:21:57 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362185
 
The Iraqi Oil Crisis

globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

ISN is reporting an Iraqi oil industry in crisis.

Iraqi oil exports fell to their lowest level in two years in November 2005. Bad management of the reconstruction effort, widespread corruption among government figures, and sabotage by insurgents are the reasons for the decline. Experts say that the US strategy of military intervention in oil-rich regions can only diminish, rather than increase, the supply to world markets.

Two-and-a-half years after the US invasion of Iraq, the country's oil industry is still in disarray. An official of the Oil Ministry in Baghdad told ISN Security Watch, on condition of anonymity: "We do not know the exact quantity of oil we are exporting, we do not exactly know the prices we are selling it for, and we do not know where the oil revenue is going to."

One of the reasons for the decline of the industry is a lack of progress in the reconstruction effort, due to serious managerial deficiencies.

For instance Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR) was awarded a US$225 million contract, without a tender, to rehabilitate the Qarmat Ali Water Plant in southern Iraq, according to a report in the Los Angeles Times.

The plant is used to pump water into the ground in order to build pressure that brings the oil to the surface.

However, the contract did not include the repair of the pipelines carrying the water to the oilfields. When the water was pumped into the ground, the old pipes burst, spilling large amounts of water into the desert. In addition, farmers often tap the water pipes in order to irrigate their fields.

A failing strategy

Oil terrorism and corruption, if allowed to continue, will seriously harm Iraq's future. The country's economy, damaged by two Gulf wars, the 2003 invasion and 13 years of UN sanctions, urgently needs a period of peaceful reconstruction and the exploration of new oilfields. Only 15 of over 70 known fields have been developed properly. It usually takes at least five years to bring a new field into operation.

Michael T. Klare, a Professor of Peace and World Security at Hampshire College and author of the book 'Blood and Oil', wrote that it is "an article of faith among America's senior policymakers – Democrats and Republicans alike – that military force is an effective tool for ensuring control over foreign sources of oil."

However, Klare concludes that "the growing Iraqi quagmire has demonstrated that the application of military force can have the very opposite effect; it can diminish – rather than enhance – America's access to foreign oil."

One of the myths of this war was that oil revenue would quickly pay for reconstruction of Iraq. Instead it has reduced the flow of oil, uncovered zero WOMDs, and led to a civil war between various Iraqi factions. The US is of course caught in the middle.

Let's consider the bright side.
Some might consider this a win-win-win situation.

* Mobil is making record profits
* The S&P energy sectors have been on fire most of the year
* Halliburton execs get to pad their pockets with "free" taxpayer money

Now if you are in a group that benefited from those developments, our strategy in Iraq might be considered a complete success. On the other hand, if you are in the much larger group more concerned about prices of gas at the pump as opposed to the government stuffing your wallet with lucrative contracts to water the desert, perhaps you see things differently.

Mike Shedlock / Mish



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)12/12/2005 4:46:41 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362185
 
Kasriel: Why Wouldn’t The Fed Want To Stop At 4-1/2 %

northerntrust.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)12/13/2005 4:01:31 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362185
 
Getting layed back in style?

talkingpointsmemo.com

(December 13, 2005 -- 03:32 PM EDT)

Former Enron Chairman Ken Lay addressed a sold-out luncheon audience today at the Houston Forum.

According to the Houston Chronicle ...

Lay blamed former Enron executives Andrew Fastow and Michael Kopper for despicable and criminal deeds that brought down the company. "We did trust Andy Fastow and sadly, tragically, that trust turned out to be fatally misplaced," he said.

Flanked on the podium by Texas and U.S. flags, and a gold and red-themed Christmas tree, Lay read from a prepared text in which he attacked the Enron Task Force and Justice Department for prosecuting the accounting firm Arthur Andersen, destroying the company and then dropping the case. He said the task force has been attempting to criminalize normal business practices.

Lay said most of what has been reported about the company has been false or distorted, and attributed its collapse to the financial community. The company's trading partners lost confidence in Enron, Lay said, clearly signaIing a ``run on the bank'' defense.

more at:

chron.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)12/16/2005 2:34:20 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362185
 
Where Is Gold Headed?

by Bill Bonner

lewrockwell.com

December 16, 2005

Another rate hike by the Fed, its 13th since it began in 2004.

Everyone said it would raise rates another time. It did. The Dow rose 55 points. Why not? Fed officials said the economy is "solid."

Of all the many adjectives that could apply to the U.S. economy, "solid" probably describes it least well. It may be "dynamic" – we don't know. It may be "flexible," "spectacular," or many other things. But solid it is not.

We have mentioned the reasons many times. We are getting as bored reciting them as you must be hearing about them. So, we move on.

We leave only the remark that an economy in which people earn less than they did the year before, spend more than ever, and save less than nothing is not solid. It is hollow. Or it is empty. Or is it soft...squishy...molasses-like.

If it is not solid, it is a liquid or a gas. In our guess, it is nothing more than a bubble floating in a world of pins.

"Yes, but American businesses are becoming more profitable than ever," say the Feds. "That's why so many people want a piece of this economy...that's why foreigners are willing to lend...and that's why we don't have to worry. The economy is in great shape."

At least in theory, American businesses are able to trim payroll costs – either by directly outsourcing to lower-cost areas, or benefiting indirectly from the globalization of the labor markets that has kept real U.S. hourly wages from rising for the last 30 years.

The problem is obvious. Unless U.S. businesses are able to sell overseas as well as buy overseas, their main market is still right here at home. How then can they sell more and more product to people who don't earn more money? There is only one way: by expanding credit. The buyers have to go further and further into debt.

"Well, why can't they just keep going into debt? After all, the value of their assets (presumably, value of the nation's ever-more profitable businesses) is rising."

But rising asset values are a feint and a fraud. You can't really sell off your house one room at a time in order to improve your lifestyle. Nor are companies that sell more products to more people who can't afford them really worth more. At the end of the day, the apparent strength and solidity of the economy just evaporates.

Gold fell yesterday. It is in an upward trend, we guess, because it knows the economy, the dollar, and U.S. stocks and bonds are not nearly as "solid" as the feds say they are. Gold is really solid. People who want a little solidity in their lives hold gold. The more they sense that other things are not solid, the more they want to feel something solid in their pockets.

"You know, there is just something nice about gold coins," said my old friend Doug Casey, the other day. "I just like the feel of them. They just feel solid."

Doug told us that our technique of buying gold on dips will be hard to implement: "This market is taking off. It's not going up and down like a yo-yo...giving you a chance to buy every time it goes down. Instead, it's a like a train leaving the station. You're either on board or you're not."

The gold bull market has entered its second phase. In the last five years, the price doubled, but there were many chances to get into gold at good prices. We recommended it below $300. Each time it would go up, people would say, "well, that's the end of that." And each time, gold would go down. Buyers were discouraged. Often, they waited to see if it would go down more before buying. Then, the price would take another step up.

Now, the market is taking bigger steps. The cautious buyer is finding it harder than ever to get into gold, because it doesn't drop back far enough to hit his or her targets.

"It's time to change the strategy," said Doug. "Look, the price could easily go to $1,000 an ounce next year. It won't matter if you bought at $500 or $550. You'll be way ahead of the game. I know I'm on board this train."

We're going to ride it to glory, dear reader.

__________________________________________________

Bill Bonner is the author, with Addison Wiggin, of Financial Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft Depression of The 21st Century and Empire of Debt: The Rise Of An Epic Financial Crisis.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)12/17/2005 10:42:52 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362185
 
From Stephen Roach at Morgan Stanley:

<<...To the extent that foreign purchases of dollar-denominated assets represent the functional equivalent of a subsidy to US interest rates, asset markets enjoy artificial valuation support. The result is a surge in housing values that many Americans now perceive to be a new and permanent source of saving. This, in turn, has had a profound impact in reshaping saving and spending strategies of US consumers. In essence, the income-based consumption models of yesteryear have been replaced by asset-driven frameworks. The repercussions of this transformation are profound: The income-based personal saving rate has plunged deeper into negative territory than at any point since 1933. At the same time, US consumers can only create newfound purchasing power by extracting equity from an ever-expanding housing stock. This is where debt enters the equation — in effect, the cost of equity extraction. The overall household sector debt ratio has been pushed up by 20 percentage points of GDP over the past five years — equal to the gain in the preceding 20 years; moreover, reflecting this overhang in the outstanding stock of indebtedness, US household sector debt-service burdens have risen to record highs — even in the context of an unusually low interest rate climate. The result is unprecedented consumer vulnerability on both the saving and debt fronts.

“So what!” retorts the symbiosis crowd. After all, these are precisely the excesses — both for China and the US — that we in the rebalancing crowd have been bemoaning for years. Fair point. Moreover, a year ago, when there were widespread concerns over global imbalances, the dollar rose instead of fell — and those concerns lost credibility. As long as the world is willing to finance America’s saving shortfall, goes the argument, there is no reason to worry about sustainability. This, in my view, is the essence of the “symbiosis trap.” The consensus has been lulled into a false sense of security — believing that imbalances will remain a non-issue for the global economy and world financial markets.

That view could well be tested in 2006. For starters, global imbalances are likely to go from bad to worse over the next 12-18 months, pushing tensions in both the US and China ever closer to the breaking point. In the case of the US, pressures are likely to intensify on two fronts — the first being the housing market. There are those, of course, who still doubt that the US property market has ascended to bubble stature. I am not in that camp. Through 3Q05, fully 40 major metropolitan areas were still experiencing year-over-year house price inflation of at least 20%; at the state level — a broader geographic unit — residential home prices for 25 states plus the District of Columbia were still rising in excess of 10%. Of course, not every home in America has gone to bubble-like extremes. But to the extent that a sizable portion of the national property market has, the broader asset class is probably in the danger zone — along with the asset- and debt-dependent American consumer.

A second area of pressures in the US is likely to come from the saving front. In a high-energy-price climate, US households are likely to defend their lifestyles by pushing the personal saving rate deeper into negative territory. Moreover, as Dick Berner and Ted Wieseman note below, the outlook for the Federal budget deficit is deteriorating once again. The net result is likely to be further erosion in America’s net national saving rate, which has been hovering at a record low of around 1.5% of GDP since early 2002. As the domestic saving rate moves inexorably toward the “zero” threshold, the US can be expected to import more and more surplus saving from abroad by running ever-widening current account and trade deficits to attract the foreign capital. In fact, our latest estimates suggest that the US current account deficit, which stood at a record 6.4% of GDP in the first half of 2005, could well increase toward 7.5% over the next year. In short, America will be upping the ante in terms of what it expects from China and the rest of the world in order to sustain the symbiosis trade.

Such an outcome could put increasingly acute pressure on an already unbalanced Chinese economy. The more dramatic the shortfall in domestic US saving, the greater the need to fill the void with foreign saving. That will put pressure on the biggest piece of America’s already gaping trade deficit — namely, the US-China bilateral trade imbalance. That, in turn, would tend to support Chinese export growth, as well as export-led fixed investment -- thereby further extending the same two sectors that have already gone to excess. At the same time, there is good reason to believe that most of America’s foreign creditors are rational — likely to exercise increasing caution in managing reserve portfolios by gradually pruning their overweight in dollar-denominated assets. That would then put added pressure on China to compensate for any shifts out of dollars — especially if it remains steadfast in resisting a sharp appreciation of the renminbi. In short, if China wants to preserve the symbiosis trade in the context of a further deterioration of the US current account deficit, it may well have to up the ante on its own imbalances.

The case for global rebalancing was dealt a tough blow in 2005. The dollar’s surprising appreciation led many to believe that financial markets are perfectly capable of coping with massive external imbalances. In my view, that coping mechanism has led to a false sense of complacency that could well be tested in 2006. In particular, a further deterioration of global imbalances — more likely than not over the next year — could well have adverse consequences for already-extended US and Chinese economies. The result could be a sharp decline in the dollar and related upward pressures on US real interest rates — developments that would take generally complacent investors by surprise. I have long been wary of new theories that spring up to explain away old problems. That was the problem with the so-called new paradigm thinking of the late 1990s. And it could well be the ultimate peril of the symbiosis trap...>>

morganstanley.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)1/6/2006 6:38:18 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362185
 
Investors Chasing Uranium Mining Stocks, Again: A Favorite Emerges

By James Finch

Fifty years ago, uranium fever hit Wall Street. It was then just a few years after a Navajo shepherd in New Mexico, by the name of Paddy Martinez, discovered "yellow rocks" on his property, mistaking them at first for gold. An avalanche of 1950s dollars (more valuable than the ones we have today) poured into mutual funds and uranium mining stocks, sending their values to astronomical levels. Get ready for déjà vu all over again, as Yogi Berra once said. Trend spotter, James Dines, editor of The Dines Letter, believes uranium mining stocks could become just as hot, or hotter, than the Internet stocks of the 1990s. (Editor's note: StockInterview.com interviewed James Dines on July 20, 2004, when he forecast a "buying panic in uranium." Since then, spot uranium (U3 08) prices have nearly doubled. Over the past 35 years, Dines has successfully predicted mega trends in gold, internet, palladium and uranium price movements). And now investors are chasing uranium mining stocks again.

A look at industry leader, Cameco (NYSE: CCJ), which money manager Robert Mitchell called the "Saudi Arabia of uranium," shows a three-year gain of more than 700 percent. Over the past few years, Australian-traded Paladin Resources, skyrocketed from under a dime to over $2/share (A$). A recent Forbes magazine cover story, entitled Going Nuclear, analyzed uranium's recent price surge, "One reason the price of uranium should keep escalating is that producers are only starting to ramp up to meet the strong demand. Utilities globally need 180 million pounds of uranium annually, but at this point a mere 108 million pounds are coming out of the ground."

Why the sudden jump? A Morgan Stanley institutional report, published in December 2004, explained that through the 1990s, uranium oxide prices stayed low because surplus uranium came into the market from weapons decommissioning. That surplus inventory worked its way through the market. The Morgan Stanley analyst forecast a "deep supply-side shortage" of uranium, citing that new mining production hasn't yet come online to remedy the deficit. In the year-ago forecast, the uranium deficit was expected to grow to nearly 20 million pounds this year (from a surplus of 6 million pounds in 2003), and then leap to a peak deficit of more than 35 million pounds in 2006. Deficits in excess of 30 million pounds were also anticipated for 2007 and 2008. According to the Morgan Stanley analyst, $50/pound may be possible in the spot price for uranium oxide, known in the trade as "yellowcake."

Mining Newsletters Favor Strathmore Minerals

What's that mean for uranium stocks? Higher prices should be anticipated as more investors, mutual funds and hedge funds search out the best returns. While the lion's share of investment dollars is likely to chase Cameco's price higher, the robust percentage gains in that stock may have already peaked. Generally, new money searches for well-capitalized junior mining stocks with solid uranium projects in their portfolio. One of those most frequently recommended among mining newsletter writers is Strathmore Minerals Corp, trading on the Toronto Venture Exchange (ticker symbol STM.V). Prominent among Strathmore's projects are in-situ leach mining operations proposed for Wyoming and New Mexico, plus an aggressive exploration program in the world's richest uranium areas, Saskatchewan's Athabasca Basin (home to uranium mining giant, Cameco).

In September, letter writer Lawrence Roulston of Resource Opportunities recommended Canadian-based Strathmore Minerals (TSX-V: STM), writing, "The company is systematically adding value to the projects most likely to be significant in the near term, especially those with near-term production potential." Also in September, Resource World contributing editor, Alf Stewart, wrote, "The two deposits Strathmore is developing were 'cherry picked' from the inventory of Kerr McGee, largest private explorer of uranium prior to that industry grinding to a halt in the early 1980s. As these properties are largely drilled off, Strathmore may be considered more of a uranium development company than an explorer." This past June, money manager Adrian Day recommended uranium stocks in his research report, writing, "So I am focusing on four main areas in uranium, with one or two buys in each... top exploration companies that have the goods and are likely to bring properties into production. Strathmore Minerals, with technically strong management, lots of properties, and a strong balance sheet, is arguably the best."

New Uranium Discovery in the Athabasca Basin?

Here's one of the stronger reasons why investors might anticipate a strong rally in Strathmore's share price over the coming twelve months: In a November 16th news release, Strathmore Minerals announced a discrete conductor, more than 30 miles long, after completing an airborne geophysical survey on the company's Davy Lake property, in the north central portion of the Athabasca Basin. According to the company's news release, "The conductor's profile response indicates a deep and in places, broad source."

Virtually all the significant unconformity uranium deposits known in the Athabasca Basin are directly associated with fault structures associated with graphitic conductors. Deposits such as Key Lake, Cigar Lake and McArthur River were found by drilling electromagnetic conductors located within magnetic lows.

In an interview with Jody Dahrouge, of Edmonton-based Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd, he told StockInterview.com, "Early indications are that this conductor is similar with other known uranium deposits, graphitic conductors with magnetic lows." On a scale of one to ten, Dahrouge rated the Davy Lake conductor a ten. "It is a long conductor, cut by structures, with deep depth and associated by a late fault," explained Dahrouge. "It is a high quality conductor that continues to depth, and it is typical of those occurring that are associated with known uranium deposits." Dahrouge described how the MegaTem II airborne geophysical survey was able to pinpoint the conductor as shallow as 600 meters and running deep to 1200 meters. Dahrouge made comparisons to other uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin. "The Sue Deposit near McLean Lake is associated with an electromagnetic conductor that is approximately 2.6 kilometers long," he said. "Based on our work at Waterbury Lake, we identified an 8 kilometers long conductor associated with the Midwest Deposit(s). The 'P2' conductor at McArthur River is approximately 13 kilometers long. This feature was first identified in 1984, by a ground Deep EM Survey. The Shea Creek deposits, located south of Cluff Lake, are associated with an approximately 25 kilometers long conductor, known as the Saskatoon Lake Conductor." Dahrouge added, "These deposits are located at depths similar to what we expect at Davy Lake."

What is probably most significant is Strathmore's gamble, by exploring away from the eastern parts of the Athabasca Basin, some 300 kilometers from the eastern Athabasca Basin, where the major discoveries have been made. "It was virtually unexplored," Dahrouge said with excitement in his voice. "It's really virgin ground." While there is ample evidence suggesting multiple uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin, other junior exploration companies are looking at the shallow parts of the eastern basin, which may not likely yield economic uranium ore. One pundit acidly questioned some of the current exploration activity in the Athabasca region, "Are they really re-flying old ground that's already been flown a hundred times, or are they just releasing old data to save money?" Dahrouge pointed out that the uranium appears to be running deeper for many of the newer discoveries, as he believes the Davy Lake property might hold true for Strathmore Minerals in the north central part of the Athabasca Basin.

Important features in many Athabascan uranium deposits are the cross-cutting fault zones. Dahrouge confirmed the Davy Lake conductor has cross-cutting fault zones with a sinistral (left-sided) fault about halfway along its length. According to Dahrouge, there is also a "conductor extension which crosses the fault from west to east and 'flows' out into a small, sub-circular magnetic low." As with many of the Athabascan uranium deposits, which tend to be found between overlying sedimentary units and underlying basement rocks, the Davy Lake conductor fits the bill. Strathmore Mineral's president, David Miller, told StockInterview.com, "the 50-plus kilometer geophysical anomaly appears to indicate a basement conductor." However, Mr. Miller tempered the exhilaration in the air, "A geophysical anomaly does not make an ore body. These exciting initial results will be followed up with infill geophysical lines, followed by ground geophysics, followed by shallow drilling, looking for alteration. When we have narrowed the target to drill, we will pull in the big rigs and test the conductor at the unconformity." Dahrouge remains excited about the Davy Lake conductor, and said, "Clearly this represents an excellent exploration target for unconformity type uranium deposits.

What does all that mean? It could explain why Strathmore Minerals might well be on the road to a world-class uranium discovery as further exploration more clearly defines how valuable those newly discovered conductors might become. Meanwhile, Strathmore's New Mexico and Wyoming properties (amounting to potentially several million pounds of uranium resource) are in the preparatory phase of the permitting process. As the spot uranium price inches forward to the widely accepted short-term target above $40/pound, several of Strathmore Mineral's properties may become instantly more valuable to a utility company who will someday need the company's uranium oxide to fuel their nuclear reactor.

James Finch regularly contributes to StockInterview.com, which can be visited at stockinterview.com. Mr. Finch does not hold equity positions in the companies he features in his column.

finista.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (7276)2/3/2006 7:12:37 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362185
 
The Bigger the Oil Price Shock, the Harder We'll Fall

economistsview.typepad.com