Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: haqihana who wrote (100185)	2/13/2005 1:45:06 PM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793711

No doubt why Eason Jordan resigned so quickly. Unless this outrageous accusation could be proven, talking about it only poisons the speaker. It's time to get off this subject because it stinks.

To: haqihana who wrote (100185)	2/13/2005 1:51:56 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793711

You have no proof of your accusations My interest is more in the story about the story, as LB has described it. Proof of my accusations against the military is irrelevant since I haven't made any. One of the stories about this story is how and why people might perceive so incorrectly that I have done so. I have worked with both cognition and group dynamics for years and continue to find them fascinating. There is plenty of fodder hereabouts to feed my fascination. It's time to get off this subject because it stinks. Yes, it does stink. While the dynamics are interesting, food fighting in lieu of argumentation is useless. You are picking at nits which is what some people do when they have nothing else to do in life. If the subject is unimportant, why engage? If you engage, it must be of some importance. Either that or you have nothing else to do in life... <g>