SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (100240)2/13/2005 4:58:08 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793660
 
I don't see how you can acknowledge the warming without recognizing that human activity plays a part in it.

Easy. You show that these climate variations were taking part just as much before human activity could have possibly be involved with them. IE: prior to the industrial revolution.



To: Lane3 who wrote (100240)2/13/2005 5:07:57 PM
From: haqihana  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793660
 
kholt, throughout the millions of years that life has existed on earth, there is evidence of weather swings that go from ice ages, to desert heat, where they were no expected. What is happening today, is nothing new, and will occur again in years to come. Looking at the weather in the north, and east, of this country, this past winter, it is hard to say there is global warming with a straight face.



To: Lane3 who wrote (100240)2/13/2005 5:35:14 PM
From: D. Long  Respond to of 793660
 
I have reservations about that. I don't see how you can acknowledge the warming without recognizing that human activity plays a part in it

You can acknowledge that climate variability exists without human activity, and existing warming trends are well within that natural variability. Which, apparently, it is.

Edit: And IMO, until human contributions to such a trend can be conclusively and persuasively isolated from natural variability, the onus is on the global warming "advocates".

Derek