SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RealMuLan who wrote (60354)2/14/2005 5:41:23 PM
From: RealMuLan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
China clears the way for Kyoto trade
February 15, 2005

Greenhouse gas reduction is about to boost the country's global status, writes Hamish McDonald.

South of Beijing an unusual hill rises out of the flat landscape of fallow fields and drab brick villages: a mountain of garbage, built by a steady stream of big blue compactor trucks delivering the solid waste of a city of 13 million people.

What is somewhat bizarrely called the "landfill" at Anding is actually the cutting edge of China's emerging contribution to preventing global warming by curbing emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

The project is the first approved in China for the emerging trade in carbon emission savings among developing countries and the advanced economies that have committed themselves to emission reductions under the Kyoto Protocol, which comes into effect tomorrow. Credits for greenhouse gas captured at Anding will be sold, probably in the Netherlands.

Big gas pipes with valves and meters stick out of the mountain, while concrete gutters channel liquids oozing from its mouldering core. Methane collected by the gas pipes is burned to evaporate the toxic "leachate" fluids channelled from the base of the garbage deposit, leaving a solid sludge that can be added to the landfill without finding its way to the underground watertables.
AdvertisementAdvertisement

The system was installed by a garbage contractor, Er Qing, in partnership with Dutch company Energy Systems International, one of a growing number of traders in the new carbon emissions trade underpinned by the Kyoto treaty's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) - an activity that meets deep suspicion among non-government environmentalists.

Methane is one of the worst greenhouse gases. Each tonne is equivalent to 21 times as much carbon dioxide. The two partners at Anding earn the equivalent of 800,000 tonnes of CO2 savings each year, which can be sold to Western or Japanese companies or governments needing to cut emissions for a price starting at $US1 a tonne. Beijing gets a cleaner garbage dump at a price subsidised by the buyer in the Netherlands.

Several other projects are in the process of approval for CDM trading, including a methane capture system in a big Shanxi coal mine, a wind farm in Inner Mongolia, a hydro-electric dam, and waste-heat capture systems in cement works and other industries.

Similar carbon-trading swaps have long been in preparation across many other developing countries that, like China, were not required to commit to emission reductions in the first round of the Kyoto process.

Some are truly inventive, such as a cattle feed developed by an Australian scientist to reduce the methane-rich belches of India's holy cows and other ruminants.

The Kyoto Protocol binds about 40 developed countries among its 128 signatories to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 5.5 per cent from the emission level of 1990. The US and Australia are the two main holdouts among the rich countries.

Greenhouse gas activities in countries such as China belie the widespread belief among Western conservatives opposed to Kyoto that the Third World is set on polluting its way to prosperity, while the existing rich countries - beset with slow growth and high unemployment - have to take sacrificial cuts to economic activity.

Although its per capita energy consumption is only a fifth that of the score of rich OECD countries such as Australia, China knows all about air pollution. About 11 per cent of China is affected by acid rain, caused by the 1.9 billion tonnes of coal produced and burnt last year.

In 1997 the World Bank reported that 178,000 premature deaths were caused each year in China by low air quality. Another 110,000 early deaths were caused by indoor pollution from cooking and heating fires. With 346,000 hospital admissions and 6.8 million outpatient visits from respiratory ailments, the cost was put at $US43 billion ($54.8 billion) a year.

China is starting to learn about global warming, too. In November, a team of Chinese and US scientists reported an alarming acceleration in the shrinkage of the great glaciers of the Tibetan plateau, the source of the Yangtze and Yellow rivers, as well as the big rivers of South-East and South Asia.

"Awareness is growing," says Professor Liu Deshun, a climate change expert at Beijing's Tsinghua University, who belongs to an international panel advising the British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, on global warming. "But it's still not enough."

As trends stand, air quality and emission of greenhouse gases are set to worsen, with coal production set to exceed 2 billion tonnes this year. Oil imports rose by more than 35 per cent last year. China is expected to produce almost 6 million vehicles this year to become the third biggest car producer after the US and Japan.

By 2020 China is expected to reach the ranks of today's moderately developed countries, such as Malaysia or Thailand, in per capita income. It will use three times as much energy as now, and will have 140 million vehicles on its roads, seven times as many as now. By then China will overtake the US as the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter.

China and other big developing countries are not due to accept reductions in Kyoto's second round until 2012. But Beijing is already moving to limit emissions. After some hesitation, China has embraced the CDM as a way of getting foreign countries to subsidise new clean technologies. But critics such as Greenpeace worry that rich countries will cherry-pick the easier and cheaper opportunities for emission savings in places like China, leaving them with much harder options when their own reduction commitments kick in after the Kyoto second round.

Projects such as Anding reduce greenhouse emissions, accepts Greenpeace International's Ben Pearson in Sydney. "But as a result of that, Dutch companies that would have had to reduce emissions in the Netherlands don't have to do that," he says.

"The value of the Kyoto Protocol as a driver for real change in the Netherlands is reduced, because you can claim these credits from China. Holland is going to meet 50 per cent of its reduction target offshore, through projects like Anding. If it had to meet 100 per cent at home, its government would have to get serious."

smh.com.au



To: RealMuLan who wrote (60354)2/15/2005 8:44:45 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
The U.S. only began an independent literature about 75 years after gaining independence – and that was after 200 years of considerable settlement!

Canada began its serious literary expression AT THE SAME TIME, at least 30 years before Canada gained “independence,” with one tenth the population of the U.S.


It's understandable the two countries literatures developed about the same time. Canada got a big surge in population from the US at the time of the Revolution. In both countries, a big enough population base needed to be developed prior to the development of a national literature.

A number of forces prevented the U.S. from developing a literature.

To begin, the U.S. began, and has continued, as an anti-intellectual country (electing presidents like the near-illiterates Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush
who is both a Yale grad and Harvard MBA and based on SAT and military tests, is likely smarter than most of the people who'll read this nonsense.)

Its powerful religious authorities established many of the world's greatest universities .

the extermination of the native Indians was a State policy, No getting their land was state policy just as it was in Canada.

..and today the small remnant are not in U.S. law First Nations (as they are in Canada) but merely the dependent refuse of conquest. There's a big ignorance of US Indian law here.

By the same token, ALL U.S. people agreed to slavery after 1776 as did all Canadian people - yep, there were slaves there too.



To: RealMuLan who wrote (60354)2/15/2005 11:04:14 PM
From: Snowshoe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
>>ALL U.S. people agreed to slavery after 1776<<

That is a despicable, blatant lie. Slavery was vigorously opposed by the Quakers, among others...

1783 Quaker Anti-Slavery Petition
rootsweb.com

To the United States in Congress Assembled

The Address from the Yearly Meeting
of the People Called Quakers

4th Day of the Tenth Month 1783

Being through the favour of Divine Providence met as usual at this season in our annual Assembly to promote the cause of Piety and Virtue, We find with great satisfaction our well meant endeavours for the relief of an oppressed part of our fellow Men have been so far blessed, that those of them who have been held in bondage by Members of our Religious Society are generally restored to freedom, their natural and just right.

Commiserating the afflicted state into which the Inhabitants of Africa are very deeply involved by many professors of the mild and benign doctrines of the Gospel, and affected with a sincere concern for the essential Good of our Country, We conceive it our indispensable duty to revive the lamentable grievance of that oppressed people in your view as an interesting subject evidently claiming the serious attention of those who are entrusted with the powers of Government, as Guardians of the common rights of Mankind and advocates for liberty.

We have long beheld with sorrow the complicated evils produced by an unrighteous commerce which subjects many thousands of the human species to the deplorable State of Slavery.

The Restoration of Peace and restraint to the effusion of human Blood we are persuaded excite in the minds of many of all Christian denominations gratitude and thankfulness to the all wise controller of human events; but we have grounds to fear, that some forgetfulness of the days of Distress are prompted from avaricious motives to renew the iniquitous trade for slaves to the African Coasts, contrary to every humane and righteous consideration, and in opposition to the solemn declarations often repeated in favour of universal liberty, thereby increasing the too general torrent of corruption and licentiousness, and laying a foundation for future calamities.

We therefore earnestly solicit your Christian interposition to discourage and prevent so obvious an Evil, in such manner as under the influence of Divine Wisdom you shall see meet.

Signed in and on behalf of our Yearly Meeting held in Philadelphia for Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware, and the western parts of Maryland and Virginia dated the fourth day of the tenth month 1783.