SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Diamond Play Cafi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chas. who wrote (2511)2/15/2005 9:38:02 AM
From: james flannigan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16206
 
Chuck no offence taken,but the question sholud be, why does bottin own 26% of MPV? Why did Debeers pay C$6.00 in 1996 for 2million MPV shares?Why did Debeers spend over $100 million on KL?Why has not Debeers walked away if KL is not worth mining?Why did Paul walk away? Why does Jan only hold 50,000 shares? These Questions should be addressed to Paul and Jan.Do we know for sure that Jans family or Pauls family hold no MPV stock? Ill go with Bottin,after all he has the most to lose. James



To: Chas. who wrote (2511)2/16/2005 6:16:16 PM
From: Famularo  Respond to of 16206
 
Re Ashton appts.........
A few key skills that Lebel and Watkins bring on board. Most of you may know or have heard of these guys.. I'm pleased they are on board and to attract such talent, both must see the Quebec project moving towards a commercial deposit....Frank