SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (219296)2/15/2005 6:54:48 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576646
 
re: Frankly, the whole process potentially seems fraught with problems. First, you have to extract the NG of say Qatar and then, turn it into liquid gas and then pipe it onto a ship. The ship then takes it to say the US where there is a facility that turns it back into a gas and sends it through pipelines to its destination. To me, its sounds like a lot of expensive and potentially dangerous work. However, with NG at $6+ per Bcf, I guess it makes it feasible. We'll see.

I don't know... we're talking multi $Billion investments by all the major oil companies. They were saying ~$14 a barrel total cost (depending on a bunch of unknown variables).

It's enough to make me curious from both an investment and political (right now our actions are making our "enemies" rich) perspective.

It's hard to find a lot of info on the Qatar plant... which makes me think I should know more.

John

PS Went and got the article, Exxon, Shell and Chevron have committed $20Billion to the Qatar plant. The industrial plant is twice the size of Manhattan.