Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (100656)	2/15/2005 10:54:54 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793782

Lt. Pantano I read this story from several sources and refrained from posting it. It sounds like a "slam dunk" for the Lt., but I doubt the Marines would bring this action without strong evidence. If it was the Army, I would swing more in his favor. We will have to wait for the Court Martial.

To: KLP who wrote (100656)	2/16/2005 4:01:55 AM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793782

The Corps has presented Lt. Pantano with a document known as a "charge sheet" that officially charges him with two counts of murder. Not much there yet to comment on. Any member of the Armed Forces may sign a court martial charge sheet. The article mentions a disgruntled Marine. He would not be the first to attempt to take down an officer. It is normal in the military system to provide legal counsel when charges are read. The convening (Commanding General) authority's actions are key. He could dismiss the charge outright or order an Article 31 investigation to advise him. He can also order a court martial. I am a strong believer in the military justice system. This case will be appropriately resolved and soon.