SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael97123 who wrote (158108)2/16/2005 9:24:12 AM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 281500
 
On the heals of the announcement of a syria/iran common front, we have this. Bashir's last gambit perhaps? If it was the israelis, the attack would be massive and already known. Wondering outloud if there are elements of iranian military that may be involved in this? Anyone have an idea on how loyal iranian military is supposed to be?

MSNBCIran TV: Explosion may have been accidental
Plane may have dropped fuel tank; earlier reports suggested attackBREAKING NEWS

MSNBC News Services
Updated: 9:18 a.m. ET Feb. 16, 2005TEHRAN, Iran - Iranian state television said Wednesday an explosion near Deilam may have been caused by a fuel tank dropping from an Iranian airplane in the region.

Iranian TV had earlier reported an explosion and the shooting off of anti-aircraft fire in the region of an Iranian nuclear facility.

"A powerful explosion was heard this morning on the outskirts of Deilam in the Bushehr province. Witnesses said that the missile was fired from an unknown plane 12 miles from the city," Iran's Arabic language Al-Alam said, according to Reuters.

A spokesman for Iran's Interior Ministry said Wednesday that he could not confirm the television reports.

"We cannot confirm the reports at this point. We are checking," said the Interior Ministry spokesman, Jahanbakhsh Khanjani.

Meantime, Reuters reported an Israeli security source, who denied any Israeli involvement in the reported explosion.

Iran's Russian-built 1,000-megawatt nuclear reactor, its only nuclear power plant, is due to start operating in Bushehr province in late 2005.



To: michael97123 who wrote (158108)2/16/2005 2:08:12 PM
From: cnyndwllr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Mike, re: Another worry i have buys into opposition to the war but it just may be reality at this point. How do we leave if the triangle is not pacified. At the time we pull out if the terrorists are strong enough to make a run at controlling the triangle they then become the new quaeda (base) for attacks on the West. I dont think at this point while this territory is being contested this is the case, but unless we hang around long enough for the good iraqis to at least have a chance of pacifying the triangle, we may be making a mistake of monumental proportions if we leave to early.

I think we have to be careful in how we pose these questions. The underlying assumption built into your question is that if we stay we can give "the good iraqis to at least have a chance of pacifying the triangle." That's the oft repeated mantra of the hawks and in my opinion that assumption is simply wrong. If it's to be a civil war then it will be a civil war. If the Iraqis don't have the resolve to address their differences with the rebels in the triangle then the triangle will continue to be a place where anti-Shiite and anti American forces are welcomed. The only thing we offer is a rallying cry for the rebels or a mercenary force to reduce the place to rubble-remember the fiasco in Fallujah?

Question everything. Ed