Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (29234)	2/16/2005 2:16:15 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 90947

I would take the kid to the school shrink, that's my final answer, I ain't going to prison for 30 years and then become the boy friend of Big Leroy

To: The Philosopher who wrote (29234)	2/16/2005 2:22:39 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 90947

Your scenario was not changed. If the teacher believed he was suicidal, she is obligated to refer him to mental health authorities immediately. If she does not she is deserving of scorn whether she has sex with him or not. They will lock him up for a 72 hour evaluation to determine the appropriate measures. Every teacher knows that. So, if she had sex with him to deter the suicide she was acting without authority as an incompetent mental health practitioner and YES, she would be deserving of scorn.