Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (219527)	2/17/2005 3:59:19 PM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574951

That any "Peoples Democratic Republic" in any language as everybody now and most then recgonized it were everything but democratic. Not to confuse with the US Dems at any time. If you have read "Mein Kampf" it is quite obvious that the National Socialisten by definition from day one had "the better" approach true democracy. But at the same time they were quite different from Marxism and Communism. Because Hitler from day 1 in Landsberg stated that in his nation the Leader (Führer) would have the ultimate power while at the same time absorbing the ultimate responsibility for his decisions. In worst case with his life at stake. The Marxists and Communists had that detail well hidden with the "Power to the population" but in real life all of the cronies except for maybe Trotskij already had their scheme set up like Hitler. While of course hiding that well. Eventually Josef and Adolf pretty much demonstrated that they were on collision courses with the same agenda I guess. Including with their Jewish roadmap. Where unfortunately the Nazis did a hell of a lot "better" job than Stalin and his team. I may not have all of this right but both had their "love for the simple man" which is the very root of Socialism. Nothing wrong with that and not even if it takes your bleeding heart to get there. The root of all evil I believe we can all agree is the extreme positions followed up by hard action to pursue those. If political or religious, that does not really matter. Actually I don't see a big difference. Incidentally any extreme position, religious or political in history seems to have done its best to eliminate any of the others, religious or political. Taro