Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LPS5 who wrote (10040)	2/17/2005 2:02:06 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 20039

Mr e > an interesting question: how do you think the buildings would have collapsed, absent the theoretical explosives? From my reading about high-rise buildings which have been on fire they don't collapse. In fact, they seem to burn for days and days until nothing more than a shell is left. Therefore, I must believe that, absent theoretical explosives, the WTC should have burned in a similar fashion to similar buildings which were ablaze. Indeed, there are reasons to believe that the fires at the WTC were not as severe as in other conflagrations and therefore there was even a good possibility that they could have been put out.