Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Gold and Silver Stocks and Related Commentary -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lhn5 who wrote (6790)	2/18/2005 2:01:00 AM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18308

Larry, once the wts collpase to a 1.5 ratio, or smaller, I would just buy the stock at that point, which could happen in a few days as the last time BWR was .86 the wts were .51 which is close to a 1.5 ratio. As the ratio shrinks 1.4,1.3,1.2, I would actually sell the wts and buy the stock, or just buy the stock. I am beating this to death now, because given the break out today, the collpase could happen tomorrow or next week. So maybe little time left. BWR got real lucky toboot in that they just purchased a great new mine the Myra falls right before the big run up in prices. And Myra falls produces a lot fo zinc, copper, silver, lead and gold; and they jsut realeased amazing results from their Toqui mine in chile. 50 foot widths of 14% zinc,5% lead and 3 oz of silver in one area and large widths of 7% zinc and 1/4 oz gold in others and their seems ot be minerals everywhere - chile. Oldbird, you are correct. It is just sort of ironic that he may have been correct. that is how physicsts are telling the story today. who knows he may have seen it, embraced it, and then discared it when people SORT of proved he was wrong. But he may have understood it at some unconscious level. Who knows he saw a lot of stuff no one else ever saw. And unlike most scientists he worked backwards i.e. he just was it! And later other mathematicians proved he was corrrect. Remember Einstein, predicted black holes, but didn't beleive in them. He was a founder of quantum mechanics and psychologically unable to accpet it? In the 1930,s Einstein and his group got into an argument with Neils Bohr, and his group :shrodenger, Paul Driac, Heisenberb, Wheeler, etc. Einstein refused to believe in the Heisenber Uncertaintly principle that "god played dice with the universe" i.e you can never know for sure the position of a particle and the momentum. It is impossible, you can only know the probabilities. But he was wrong and finally conceded he was wrong after trying every trick in the book to get around it and prove the quantum guys were correct. By the way-lol- it is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle )that keeps electrons from falling into a nucleus (a concept) and when one is not looking or measureing or interacting with that electron, It does not exist-lol. It is jsut a probability (a wave). That drove Einstein nuts, but is accepted as truth today. If you measure the wave action collapses into an electron.