SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe Btfsplk who wrote (7906)2/21/2005 4:53:07 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Respond to of 361240
 
I just did...see the posts to you. I'm sorry if I've wrecked your day pointing out that the company you work for - Walmart - sucks.



To: Joe Btfsplk who wrote (7906)2/21/2005 4:58:46 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Respond to of 361240
 
former employees: When Lance Hindman thinks about his working days at Wal-Mart, he tries to remember the friendships he had with his co-workers. "They were friendly, good people," he says.

The rest of his memories as a three-year Wal-Mart employee aren't so pleasant. Hindman, a meatcutter for Kroger in Greenbrier, Ark. and member of Little Rock Local 2008, says that at Wal-Mart there's constant stress about sales. The atmosphere is full of pressure, he says. "If your work was caught up and you were talking to other guys in the backroom, a manager would crack you down and say you needed to be cutting meat."

As an experienced meatcutter, Hindman started out earning $8 an hour at Wal-Mart. His wages at Kroger, after only four months on the job, he says, are equal to what some managers make at Wal-Mart.

When asked about health benefits, he says, "Wal-Mart gets a chunk of change from you coming and going." Hindman explains that you either pay a large deductible for your doctor visits or they take more out of your wages for the insurance. Hindman has one word for the Wal-Mart benefit factor: "lousy." After three years at Wal-Mart, he says he still hadn't qualified for pension benefits.

Another thing about Wal-Mart, Hindman says, "I'd never want to move up in that company. What they want are yes men, not problem solvers. Their managers turnover a lot, and the ones I had didn't really know the meat business. So I never had any confidence in them."



To: Joe Btfsplk who wrote (7906)2/21/2005 5:00:06 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361240
 
LAS VEGAS—Carrying blue umbrellas and signs declaring that "Wal-Mart is Anti-Women," hundreds of NOW activists braved 105-degree weather at noon on Saturday to make a point about reports of systematic discrimination against women at the country's largest employer.
Delegates to the National NOW Conference in Las Vegas converged at a local Wal-Mart superstore to protest discrimination against women at the country's largest employer.
Delegates to the National NOW Conference in Las Vegas converged at a local Wal-Mart superstore to protest discrimination against women at the country's largest employer. Photo by Lisa Bennett.

The demonstrators—many wearing buttons and T-shirts with the slogan 'Wal-Mart Always Discriminates'—marched en masse in the parking lot of a local Wal-Mart superstore, chanting and distributing informational flyers to prospective customers, some of whom turned back after seeing the materials and told activists they would shop somewhere else.

Earlier that morning, after hearing from former Wal-Mart employees who described the discrimination they endured on the job, hundreds of National NOW Conference delegates were inspired to pour out of a conference hall at the Riviera Hotel and Resort and travel by bus to the local Wal-Mart.

Addressing a Saturday morning plenary session, former Wal-Mart employee Stephanie Odle described how she was repeatedly passed over for promotions during her employment at the retailer, paid less than men doing the same job, and then unceremoniously fired when a man was hired to fill her position.
Photo by Lisa Bennett.

She is now the lead plaintiff in the massive class-action lawsuit against Wal-Mart, originally filed in 2001, that charges the retailer discriminates against its female retail employees in pay and promotions. The class in this case includes more than 1.6 million current and former female employees of Wal-Mart retail stores in America, including Wal-Mart discount stores, super centers, neighborhood stores, and Sam's Clubs.

Odle was followed on stage by Jackie and Larry Allen, former Wal-Mart employees who described how the retailer ignored complaints of sexual harassment, and refused to provide affordable health insurance. Standing with the aid of crutches, Jackie Allen explained how she left Wal-Mart for a job at a different retailer that provided health insurance that allowed her to undergo knee surgery, coverage she was not able to afford while working at Wal-Mart.

Photo by Lisa Bennett.
Wal-Mart is one of the few employers of its kind that doesn't allow workers to join unions, said Roberta West, a representative from United Food and Commercial Workers Local 711 in Las Vegas.

Speaking Out for Women

Carolyn Sapp, a former 1992 Miss America who serves as an unofficial spokeswoman for the plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit, addressed the crowd assembled in the Wal-Mart parking lot, along with NOW leaders, who explained how the organization named Wal-Mart a "Merchant of Shame" in 2002 to create awareness of the employer's practices.

"Consumers need to know the source of Wal-Mart's low prices," said NOW Action Vice President Olga Vives. "Those low prices come from the substandard wages and benefits that Wal-Mart provides to the employees—in particular, the women workers—who work in its stores each day."



To: Joe Btfsplk who wrote (7906)2/21/2005 5:04:46 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Respond to of 361240
 
Wal-Mart nation: the race to the bottom

By Floyd J. McKay
Special to The Times

E-mail E-mail this article
Print Print this article
Print Search archive
0

Los Angeles is not my kind of town. But the Angelinos are about to take a stand that ought to be applauded across the country.

That stand is to say "no" to a Wal-Mart "supercenter" that the retailing giant hopes to open in the city.

These superstores are not your father's Wal-Mart; they are monstrous, sprawling over some 25 acres and employing up to 600 workers. Their lure, of course, is lower prices.

Wal-Mart, it seems to me, epitomizes the race to the bottom that has the United States by the throat as the 21st century opens.

Why do people shop at these behemoths, when they know full well that they are driving out of existence small businesses owned and operated by their neighbors, employing other neighbors?

They shop because of price, and they are forced to do so by the declining standard of living we have offered working people for more than a generation. People who work for minimum wage, with little or no benefits, who cannot afford to fix their car or their kids' teeth have no choice but to search out the lowest price.

Wal-Mart buys offshore, without apology and for the cheapest possible prices, from companies paying the lowest-possible wages.

As jobs in America are lost to foreign sweatshops to feed the Wal-Mart engine, American workers are forced to accept jobs at lower pay, with bad working conditions. They are funneled to Wal-Mart's promise of cheap goods, in effect patronizing the very companies that caused their economic misery.

This is a cruel travesty on working people in this country.

Wal-Mart is currently being sued in some 40 cases charging various abuses of labor laws, and last fall it was reported the company extensively employs illegal aliens as janitors. Wal-Mart has successfully opposed unionization and frequently pays well below competing stores.

All of these practices — alleged abuses of labor laws, hiring illegals, and the low rate of pay and benefits at Wal-Mart — serve to depress the labor market in communities in which the giant is located. That is a major factor in Los Angeles' opposition to the supercenter.

We live in a nation in which the real-dollar income of an average family has declined for years, while corporate profits and executive pay have skyrocketed.

The gap between rich and poor has widened at an alarming rate in the past 20 years. In 44 states, the gap has increased not only between rich and poor, but between rich and middle-class families. None of the six exceptions is a Northwest state. Oregon has one of the worst gaps, Washington is about average.

In some states, the inequity is staggering. In three of the nation's largest states — California, New York and Ohio — families in the lowest 20 percent bracket actually lost real income from 1978 to 2000. In 1999 dollars, the loss was between 5 and 6 percent. In those same states, the real income gain for the top 20 percent of families ranged from 37 to 54 percent.

Nationwide, from 1978 to 2000, the lowest 20 percent of families gained only $972 annually, or 7.1 percent; the top 5 percent gained $87,779, or 58.4 percent.

These findings, by the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (www.cbpp.org), were before the Bush tax cuts and the current recession, both of which will further widen the gap.

You can't blame Sam Walton for this disparity, but operations like Wal-Mart feed off the impoverishment of America.

Sadly, there are byproducts in quality of life, often unseen until it is too late.

The greatest is the destruction of America's small and mid-sized towns, increasingly bereft of small businesses and dominated by big-box retailers — acres of barren asphalt parking lots, corporate managers on their way to the next-larger store, employees scrambling to keep low-wage jobs.

My wife's recently deceased aunt could no longer shop in the small Iowa town where she and her late husband ran a feed store. The store is closed, as are the other small businesses. The elderly woman had to drive — or be driven — past the empty shops several miles to Wal-Mart, the nearest place to get the basics of life.

Wal-Mart is like a neutron bomb, sucking life out of small towns, leaving buildings without the essence of civic life.

Those of us fortunate to earn middle-class incomes can make a choice, and shun Wal-Mart. The tragedy is that for an ever-increasing segment of America, the despicable race to the bottom has left no other choice than to shop for cheap, regardless of the consequences.

Floyd J. McKay, a journalism professor at Western Washington University, is a regular contributor to Times editorial pages. E-mail him at floydmckay@yahoo.com

Copyright © 2004 The Seattle Times Company



To: Joe Btfsplk who wrote (7906)2/21/2005 5:05:24 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Respond to of 361240
 
Wal-Mart foes detail costs to community
Public subsidizes workers, study says

Charles Burress, Chronicle Staff Writer

Tuesday, February 17, 2004


* Printable Version
* Email This Article

The closely watched campaign in Contra Costa County to block Wal- Mart superstores brought out its heavy political guns Monday when Rep. George Miller, D-Martinez, flanked by local lawmakers, released a blistering report on "labor abuses and hidden costs" of the corporate Goliath.

"We see a downward spiral within the community that is led by Wal-Mart," Miller said at a news conference at his Concord office.

Two weeks remain before voters decide the fate of hotly contested Measure L, which would in effect bar Wal-Mart Supercenters in unincorporated areas of the county.

Substandard pay and health care benefits for Wal-Mart workers allow the firm to charge very low prices that force nearby stores to slash their workers' pay and benefits in order to compete, said Miller, ranking Democrat on the House Education and Workforce Committee.

Plans by Wal-Mart to introduce 40 Supercenters into California are behind the bitter 4-month-old grocery store strike in Southern California, where supermarkets are demanding that workers assume a greater share of health care costs, Miller said.

Miller released a 22-page report by the Democratic staff of his House committee detailing how nonunionized Wal-Mart, the largest employer in both the United States and Mexico, allegedly imposes financial burdens on local governments. A certain percentage of its workers must turn to subsidized medical care, free school lunches, housing subsidies and other taxpayer- supported welfare services, Miller said.

A typical Wal-Mart store with 200 employees would cost taxpayers $420,750 per year, according to the report. Its employees were paid an average of $8.23 an hour in 2001, compared with $10.35 for a supermarket worker, the report said.

Wal-Mart's chief spokeswoman, Mona Williams, called Miller's attack irresponsible and his figures "pure fantasy."

"His so-called study is clearly aimed at pleasing the labor unions who make up such a large part of his financial support," Williams said by phone Monday from the company headquarters in Bentonville, Ark.

She said a Wal-Mart Supercenter creates 400 to 500 jobs.

"Are our competitors offering these same jobs -- or would many of these people remain jobless without Wal-Mart?" she said.

Hourly pay varies across the country, but wages at a Supercenter in Northern California would probably be around the $9.55 paid in Las Vegas, which she called "very close to the union wage."

Roughly 90 percent of Wal-Mart employees have health insurance coverage, Williams added.

"More than 40 percent of associates (employees) on our health care plan had no coverage at all before coming to Wal-Mart," Williams said. "We are talking about people who might have fallen through the cracks without Wal-Mart -- and then truly become a financial burden to local communities."

Other localities in the state, including Alameda County, are battling Wal- Mart in similar attempts to block the retail giant.

Wal-Mart operates 1,471 Supercenters in the United States, and its first California one is due to open in La Quinta, near Palm Springs, next month, said Bob McAdam, a company spokesman for California.

California has 138 regular Wal-Mart stores, which are smaller and, unlike Supercenters, don't sell groceries.

Barbara Carpenter, head of Local 1179 of the United Food and Commercial Workers, says two supermarkets are shut down by the opening of each Supercenter. She says the firm's "profit-first philosophy" is "undermining the living standards of American families."

Williams says Wal-Mart stimulates development: "Any time a new Wal-Mart moves in, you'll see a whole new commercial development spring up around it to take advantage of the customer traffic that's coming there."

Assemblywoman Loni Hancock, a Democrat representing parts of Contra Costa and Alameda counties, said at Miller's office that Wal-Mart represented "one of the greatest fortunes in the world that has been built on human misery and public subsidy."

Also at the news conference were Contra Costa County Supervisors Mark DeSaulnier and John Gioia.

This story has been corrected since it appeared in print editions.

E-mail Charles Burress at cburress@sfchronicle.com.



To: Joe Btfsplk who wrote (7906)2/21/2005 5:06:13 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Respond to of 361240
 
Are you thinking about any of this - the ramifications, repercussions, the anti-American destruction of free enterprise and choice? I hope so.