SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy who wrote (220183)2/22/2005 12:32:22 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573819
 
"What is "international law"?"

Excellent question. You are correct that there isn't a codified body of laws with an authority that has power of enforcement. What we do have is a generally agreed upon set of rules of behaviour that everyone in the first world pretty much goes along with. A large percentage of them are embodied in the Geneva Convention, but it goes beyond that. Ok, there are others, like the Law of the Sea conferences that try to codify the way that countries interact on various issues. But for the topic under discussion, they are extraneous...

Ok, what is the penalty if a country violates these "laws"? Probably the worst for those that crave moral authority, rejection by the first world community. For a Hitler(to take a 20th Century analog) this is not a problem, for a Ghandi(to extend the model), it is. History tends to back the Ghandi approach, but the Hitler approach could win out...