SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (158393)2/22/2005 5:03:07 PM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 281500
 
Yes but it should be at some time in the future, hopefully when differences in political systems are less pronounced. If anything, they are more pronounced now than they have been in some time--some of this is caused by independence movement in taiwan but alot of it is from the highly nationalist authoritarian nature of todays china. mike



To: TimF who wrote (158393)2/22/2005 5:20:32 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 281500
 
<<If a re-unification needs to occur it means that Taiwan isn't really part of China now.>>

Good point.



To: TimF who wrote (158393)2/22/2005 5:22:14 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I seem to recall there was extensive dialogue a few months ago on the relationship of China and Taiwan, whether Taiwan was or was not part of China, technically or practically and how it would end up sooner or later.... how did that exchange conclude? Maybe you folks could pick up from there rather than repeating the entire exchange all over again.

jttmab


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News